Menu
GeneBe

rs200586877

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):c.9389C>G(p.Pro3130Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000264 in 1,614,160 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P3130L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

1
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.411
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.037063777).
BP6
Variant 2-73491348-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73491348-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 393378.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_risk_allele=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.9389C>G p.Pro3130Arg missense_variant 10/23 ENST00000613296.6
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.9392C>G p.Pro3131Arg missense_variant 10/23

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.9389C>G p.Pro3130Arg missense_variant 10/231 NM_001378454.1 P3Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000164
AC:
25
AN:
152186
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000160
AC:
40
AN:
249458
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000155
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
135340
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000646
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000336
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000165
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000274
AC:
401
AN:
1461856
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000249
AC XY:
181
AN XY:
727224
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000351
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000828
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000164
AC:
25
AN:
152304
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000246
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000242
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000732
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
0.000116
AC:
14
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Alstrom syndrome Uncertain:3Other:1
Uncertain risk allele, criteria provided, single submitterresearchClinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic-Potent mutations in ALMS1 are associated with a rare condition called Alstrom syndrome. It can cause excessive eating, insulin resistance. However, no evidence is found to ascertain the role of rs200586877 in Alstrom syndrome yet. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPhosphorus, Inc.Aug 01, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeAug 31, 2022This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 3131 of the ALMS1 protein (p.Pro3131Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs200586877, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ALMS1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 393378). Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the functional significance of this variant is currently unknown. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 24, 2020The p.Pro3131Arg variant in ALMS1 has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss, but has been identified in 0.03% (46/128626) of European chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 393378). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PM2_Supporting, BP4. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 25, 2019Variant summary: The variant, ALMS1 c.9386C>G (p.Pro3129Arg, also known as c.9392C>G) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 277096 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in ALMS1 causing Cardiomyopathy (0.00016 vs 0.0022), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.9386C>G in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (Uncertain Significance X2 ; Likely benign X1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 21, 2022In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchPersonalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of MedicineJan 25, 2019ACMG criteria: BP4 (REVEL 0.037 + 7 predictors), BP1 (missense variant when truncating case disease)=likely benign -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 22, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.33
Cadd
Benign
21
Dann
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.030
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.33
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.23
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.53
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.75
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0058
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.037
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.88
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D;D
Vest4
0.14
MVP
0.24
ClinPred
0.035
T
GERP RS
2.1
Varity_R
0.059
gMVP
0.053

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200586877; hg19: chr2-73718475; API