Menu
GeneBe

rs200588338

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.1179C>T(p.Pro393=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00138 in 1,551,698 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00074 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RBM20
NM_001134363.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.170
Variant links:
Genes affected
RBM20 (HGNC:27424): (RNA binding motif protein 20) This gene encodes a protein that binds RNA and regulates splicing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 10-110781788-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110781788-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43966.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=4, Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr10-110781788-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-110781788-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.17 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000742 (113/152242) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00128 (87/68044). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00106. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 51 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 113 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RBM20NM_001134363.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1179C>T p.Pro393= synonymous_variant 2/14 ENST00000369519.4
RBM20XM_017016103.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1014C>T p.Pro338= synonymous_variant 2/14
RBM20XM_017016104.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.795C>T p.Pro265= synonymous_variant 2/14
RBM20XM_047425116.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.795C>T p.Pro265= synonymous_variant 2/14

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RBM20ENST00000369519.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1179C>T p.Pro393= synonymous_variant 2/141 NM_001134363.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000742
AC:
113
AN:
152242
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000699
AC:
108
AN:
154474
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000731
AC XY:
60
AN XY:
82042
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000252
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000483
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000119
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00182
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00145
AC:
2035
AN:
1399456
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00147
AC XY:
1018
AN XY:
690234
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000190
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000280
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000543
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000406
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00175
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00152
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000742
AC:
113
AN:
152242
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000686
AC XY:
51
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000956
Alfa
AF:
0.00103
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000740
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 30, 2013Pro393Pro in exon 2 of RBM20: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. Pro393Pro in exon 2 of RBM20 (allele frequen cy = n/a) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 08, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 25, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2022RBM20: BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 27, 2024- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioFeb 07, 2018- -
RBM20-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 17, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 09, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
Cadd
Benign
6.4
Dann
Benign
0.68

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200588338; hg19: chr10-112541546; COSMIC: COSV65703974; API