rs200588338
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.1179C>T(p.Pro393=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00138 in 1,551,698 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00074 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
RBM20
NM_001134363.3 synonymous
NM_001134363.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.170
Genes affected
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 10-110781788-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110781788-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43966.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr10-110781788-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-110781788-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.17 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000742 (113/152242) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00128 (87/68044). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00106. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 51 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 113 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | NM_001134363.3 | c.1179C>T | p.Pro393= | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | ENST00000369519.4 | NP_001127835.2 | |
RBM20 | XM_017016103.3 | c.1014C>T | p.Pro338= | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | XP_016871592.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_017016104.3 | c.795C>T | p.Pro265= | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | XP_016871593.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_047425116.1 | c.795C>T | p.Pro265= | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | XP_047281072.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | ENST00000369519.4 | c.1179C>T | p.Pro393= | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | 1 | NM_001134363.3 | ENSP00000358532 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000742 AC: 113AN: 152242Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
113
AN:
152242
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000699 AC: 108AN: 154474Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000731 AC XY: 60AN XY: 82042
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
108
AN:
154474
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
60
AN XY:
82042
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00145 AC: 2035AN: 1399456Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00147 AC XY: 1018AN XY: 690234
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2035
AN:
1399456
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1018
AN XY:
690234
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000742 AC: 113AN: 152242Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000686 AC XY: 51AN XY: 74370
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
113
AN:
152242
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
51
AN XY:
74370
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 30, 2013 | Pro393Pro in exon 2 of RBM20: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. Pro393Pro in exon 2 of RBM20 (allele frequen cy = n/a) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 08, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 25, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2022 | RBM20: BS1, BS2 - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 27, 2024 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 07, 2018 | - - |
RBM20-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 17, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 09, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at