rs200595318

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000093.5(COL5A1):c.924+14G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00039 in 1,613,822 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00039 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A1
NM_000093.5 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.17

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL5A1 (HGNC:2209): (collagen type V alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. The encoded procollagen protein occurs commonly as the heterotrimer pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha2(V). Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

COL5A1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).

BP6

Variant 9-134728821-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-134728821-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136925.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000374 (57/152206) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000785 (12/15288). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000452. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 37 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 57 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL5A1	NM_000093.5 link	c.924+14G>A	intron_variant	Intron 6 of 65	ENST00000371817.8	NP_000084.3	P20908-1A0A024R8E5B2ZZ86Q59EE7
COL5A1	NM_001278074.1 link	c.924+14G>A	intron_variant	Intron 6 of 65		NP_001265003.1	B2ZZ86Q59EE7
COL5A1	XM_017014266.3 link	c.924+14G>A	intron_variant	Intron 6 of 64		XP_016869755.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL5A1	ENST00000371817.8 link	c.924+14G>A		intron_variant	Intron 6 of 65	1	NM_000093.5	ENSP00000360882.3		P20908-1
COL5A1	ENST00000371820.4 link	c.924+14G>A		intron_variant	Intron 6 of 65	2		ENSP00000360885.4		P20908-2H7BY82

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000374

AC:

AN:

152206

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000785

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000470

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000500

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000361

AC:

AN:

249336

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000341

AC XY:

AN XY:

134952

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000618

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000604

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000607

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000392

AC:

573

AN:

1461616

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000403

AC XY:

293

AN XY:

727096

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000765

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000507

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000465

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000248

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000374

AC:

AN:

152206

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000498

AC XY:

AN XY:

74354

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000785

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000470

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000500

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000215

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000257

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 09, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Feb 27, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.90

CADD

Benign

0.79

DANN

Benign

0.31

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over