rs200650026
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_000960.4(PTGIR):c.937G>C(p.Gly313Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000601 in 1,614,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely benign in ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000960.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000960.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTGIR | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.937G>C | p.Gly313Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000291294.1 | P43119 | ||
| PTGIR | c.937G>C | p.Gly313Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000543010.1 | ||||
| PTGIR | c.937G>C | p.Gly313Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000543013.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000478 AC: 12AN: 250878 AF XY: 0.0000589 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000636 AC: 93AN: 1461852Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000701 AC XY: 51AN XY: 727226 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74334 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at