rs200663107
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_005120.3(MED12):c.5711C>T(p.Ala1904Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00104 in 1,209,731 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. There are 413 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005120.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED12 | NM_005120.3 | c.5711C>T | p.Ala1904Val | missense_variant | 39/45 | ENST00000374080.8 | NP_005111.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED12 | ENST00000374080.8 | c.5711C>T | p.Ala1904Val | missense_variant | 39/45 | 1 | NM_005120.3 | ENSP00000363193 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000896 AC: 100AN: 111610Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.000769 AC XY: 26AN XY: 33796
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00118 AC: 213AN: 180002Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00103 AC XY: 69AN XY: 66790
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00105 AC: 1156AN: 1098070Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00106 AC XY: 387AN XY: 363426
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000896 AC: 100AN: 111661Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.000768 AC XY: 26AN XY: 33857
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jan 18, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 23, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28152038, 26813965, 24728327) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 09, 2015 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 14, 2015 | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 18, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
FG syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
MED12-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 23, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at