rs200690226
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_000057.4(BLM):āc.274A>Gā(p.Asn92Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000142 in 1,614,212 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000057.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | NM_000057.4 | c.274A>G | p.Asn92Asp | missense_variant | 3/22 | ENST00000355112.8 | NP_000048.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | ENST00000355112.8 | c.274A>G | p.Asn92Asp | missense_variant | 3/22 | 1 | NM_000057.4 | ENSP00000347232.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000135 AC: 34AN: 251348Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000147 AC XY: 20AN XY: 135854
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000141 AC: 206AN: 1461858Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000133 AC XY: 97AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152354Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74502
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Bloom syndrome Uncertain:4Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pars Genome Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jul 02, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 29, 2018 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 11, 2024 | In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in the heterozygous and homozygous state in patients with breast cancer (PMID: 30262796, 35264596); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 35264596, 30262796) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 03, 2023 | The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00023 (30/129096 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in an individual homozygous for the variant and suspected of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (PMID: 30262796 (2018)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Jun 19, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 18, 2022 | DNA sequence analysis of the BLM gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.274A>G, in exon 3 that results in an amino acid change, p.Asn92Asp. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.023% in the non-Finnish European subpopulation (dbSNP rs200690226). The p.Asn92Asp change affects a poorly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the BLM protein that is not known to be functional. The p.Asn92Asp substitution appears to be benign using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). This sequence change has previously described in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 30262796). Due to insufficient evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Asn92Asp change remains unknown at this time. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 16, 2022 | The p.N92D variant (also known as c.274A>G), located in coding exon 2 of the BLM gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 274. The asparagine at codon 92 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant has been reported in 1/327 Mexican patients with a personal and/or family history suspicious for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome; this individual was homozygous for the variant but additional clinical information was not provided (Quezada Urban R et al. Cancers (Basel), 2018 Sep;10:). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Sep 13, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at