rs200704785
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006415.4(SPTLC1):c.1254+10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00172 in 1,565,952 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 53 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00094 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 50 hom. )
Consequence
SPTLC1
NM_006415.4 intron
NM_006415.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.725
Genes affected
SPTLC1 (HGNC:11277): (serine palmitoyltransferase long chain base subunit 1) This gene encodes a member of the class-II pyridoxal-phosphate-dependent aminotransferase family. The encoded protein is the long chain base subunit 1 of serine palmitoyltransferase. Serine palmitoyltransferase converts L-serine and palmitoyl-CoA to 3-oxosphinganine with pyridoxal 5'-phosphate and is the key enzyme in sphingolipid biosynthesis. Mutations in this gene were identified in patients with hereditary sensory neuropathy type 1. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. Pseudogenes of this gene have been defined on chromosomes 1, 6, 10, and 13. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
?
Variant 9-92038238-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-92038238-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 367544.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000936 (142/151772) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0276 (133/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0237. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 97 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 142 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTLC1 | NM_006415.4 | c.1254+10C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000262554.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTLC1 | ENST00000262554.7 | c.1254+10C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_006415.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000936 AC: 142AN: 151654Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
142
AN:
151654
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00378 AC: 951AN: 251476Hom.: 18 AF XY: 0.00516 AC XY: 701AN XY: 135916
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
951
AN:
251476
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
701
AN XY:
135916
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00180 AC: 2552AN: 1414180Hom.: 50 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00266 AC XY: 1881AN XY: 706248
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2552
AN:
1414180
Hom.:
Cov.:
26
AF XY:
AC XY:
1881
AN XY:
706248
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000936 AC: 142AN: 151772Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00131 AC XY: 97AN XY: 74210
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
142
AN:
151772
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
97
AN XY:
74210
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 25, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 1A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Nov 15, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at