rs200776757
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP2
The NM_023110.3(FGFR1):c.1368G>T(p.Met456Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000561 in 1,614,218 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00043 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00057 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
FGFR1
NM_023110.3 missense
NM_023110.3 missense
Scores
1
14
4
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.90
Genes affected
FGFR1 (HGNC:3688): (fibroblast growth factor receptor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family, where amino acid sequence is highly conserved between members and throughout evolution. FGFR family members differ from one another in their ligand affinities and tissue distribution. A full-length representative protein consists of an extracellular region, composed of three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single hydrophobic membrane-spanning segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation. This particular family member binds both acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors and is involved in limb induction. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Pfeiffer syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Antley-Bixler syndrome, osteoglophonic dysplasia, and autosomal dominant Kallmann syndrome 2. Chromosomal aberrations involving this gene are associated with stem cell myeloproliferative disorder and stem cell leukemia lymphoma syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants which encode different protein isoforms have been described; however, not all variants have been fully characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), FGFR1. . Gene score misZ 2.4852 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 4.2642 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 2 with or without anosmia, encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, tooth agenesis, isolated trigonocephaly, Pfeiffer syndrome type 1, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Kallmann syndrome, septooptic dysplasia, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 7 with or without anosmia, holoprosencephaly, osteoglophonic dwarfism, Hartsfield-Bixler-Demyer syndrome.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGFR1 | NM_023110.3 | c.1368G>T | p.Met456Ile | missense_variant | 10/18 | ENST00000447712.7 | NP_075598.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGFR1 | ENST00000447712.7 | c.1368G>T | p.Met456Ile | missense_variant | 10/18 | 1 | NM_023110.3 | ENSP00000400162 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000427 AC: 65AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
65
AN:
152228
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000421 AC: 105AN: 249554Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000421 AC XY: 57AN XY: 135390
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
105
AN:
249554
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
135390
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000575 AC: 840AN: 1461872Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000568 AC XY: 413AN XY: 727234
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
840
AN:
1461872
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
413
AN XY:
727234
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000427 AC: 65AN: 152346Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000416 AC XY: 31AN XY: 74502
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
65
AN:
152346
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
74502
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
AC:
47
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 17, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29419413, 25077900) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 2 with or without anosmia Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital | May 04, 2023 | The variant has been classified as VUS based on the variant meeting the following ACMG Criteria: PP1,PP2,BP4,BP4. - |
Craniosynostosis, nonspecific Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Nov 03, 2016 | - - |
Trigonocephaly 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Osteoglophonic dysplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Pfeiffer syndrome;C1563720:Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 2 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 05, 2024 | - - |
Craniosynostosis syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;.;D;.;.;.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.077, 0.13, 0.060
.;.;B;B;.;.;B;B;.;.
Vest4
MutPred
0.29
.;.;Loss of loop (P = 0.1258);.;.;.;.;.;.;.;
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at