rs200784979

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_030962.4(SBF2):​c.5037C>T​(p.Arg1679Arg) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000499 in 1,613,646 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00044 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SBF2
NM_030962.4 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0002742
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.519
Variant links:
Genes affected
SBF2 (HGNC:2135): (SET binding factor 2) This gene encodes a pseudophosphatase and member of the myotubularin-related protein family. This gene maps within the CMT4B2 candidate region of chromosome 11p15 and mutations in this gene have been associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, type 4B2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
SBF2-AS1 (HGNC:27438): (SBF2 antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 11-9787634-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-9787634-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 383688.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr11-9787634-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.519 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00044 (67/152260) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000529 (36/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000392. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 47 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SBF2NM_030962.4 linkc.5037C>T p.Arg1679Arg splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 40 ENST00000256190.13 NP_112224.1 Q86WG5-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SBF2ENST00000256190.13 linkc.5037C>T p.Arg1679Arg splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 40 1 NM_030962.4 ENSP00000256190.8 Q86WG5-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000440
AC:
67
AN:
152142
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000426
AC:
107
AN:
251446
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000361
AC XY:
49
AN XY:
135896
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000173
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000652
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000378
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000505
AC:
738
AN:
1461386
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000498
AC XY:
362
AN XY:
727032
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000157
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00307
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00189
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000442
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000265
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000440
AC:
67
AN:
152260
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000631
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
74444
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000346
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000230
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Sep 01, 2020
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 16, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 11, 2019
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4B2 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Dec 23, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:1
Nov 01, 2021
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

SBF2-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 28, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Nov 24, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
1.4
DANN
Benign
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00027
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.090
SpliceAI score (max)
0.080
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200784979; hg19: chr11-9809181; COSMIC: COSV56289976; COSMIC: COSV56289976; API