rs200799870

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000238.4(KCNH2):c.3111C>T(p.Asp1037Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000207 in 1,547,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

KCNH2
NM_000238.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.567

Variant links:

Genes affected

KCNH2 (HGNC:6251): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2) This gene encodes a component of a voltage-activated potassium channel found in cardiac muscle, nerve cells, and microglia. Four copies of this protein interact with one copy of the KCNE2 protein to form a functional potassium channel. Mutations in this gene can cause long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2). Transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

KCNH2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).

BP6

Variant 7-150947369-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-150947369-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 194157.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.567 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00116 (176/152184) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00407 (169/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00357. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 80 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 176 AD,Digenic gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KCNH2	NM_000238.4 link	c.3111C>T	p.Asp1037Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 15	ENST00000262186.10	NP_000229.1	Q12809-1Q15BH2A0A090N8Q0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KCNH2	ENST00000262186.10 link	c.3111C>T	p.Asp1037Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 15	1	NM_000238.4	ENSP00000262186.5	Q12809-1
KCNH2	ENST00000330883.9 link	c.2091C>T	p.Asp697Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 11	1		ENSP00000328531.4	Q12809-2
KCNH2	ENST00000684241.1 link	n.3944C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 11 of 13

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00116

AC:

176

AN:

152066

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00408

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000955

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000145

AC:

AN:

144620

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000510

AC XY:

AN XY:

78382

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00283

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000363

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000104

AC:

145

AN:

1394948

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000799

AC XY:

AN XY:

688192

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00325

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000280

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000126

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000204

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000311

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00116

AC:

176

AN:

152184

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00108

AC XY:

AN XY:

74410

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00407

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000589

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000945

Alfa

AF:

0.0000852

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00124

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 06, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 21, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 05, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Aug 22, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 16, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: KCNH2 c.3111C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00036 in 170308 control chromosomes, predominantly within the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.004 in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 40 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in KCNH2 causing Arrhythmia phenotype (0.0001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3111C>T in individuals affected with Arrhythmia and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (two classifying the variant as "Likely benign", and one as a VUS). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Long QT syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Apr 26, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Cardiac arrhythmia

Benign:1

Oct 22, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

0.30

DANN

Benign

0.88

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.9

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over