rs200811582

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The ENST00000437056.5(PJVK):n.1931A>C variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000382 in 1,613,996 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

PJVK
ENST00000437056.5 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.98

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PJVK (HGNC:29502): (pejvakin) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the gasdermin family, a family which is found only in vertebrates. The encoded protein is required for the proper function of auditory pathway neurons. Defects in this gene are a cause of non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal recessive type 59 (DFNB59). [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

PJVK Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 59
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

PJVK links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).

BP6

Variant 2-178461276-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178461276-A-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 226561.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000604 (92/152364) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0143 (74/5190). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0116. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 47 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PJVK	NM_001042702.5 link	c.*2A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 7 of 7	ENST00000644580.2	NP_001036167.1	Q0ZLH3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PJVK	ENST00000644580.2 link	c.*2A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 7 of 7		NM_001042702.5	ENSP00000495855.2		Q0ZLH3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000598

AC:

AN:

152246

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0140

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00152

AC:

380

AN:

249294

AF XY:

0.00132

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000194

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000869

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0198

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00198

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000359

AC:

524

AN:

1461632

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000351

AC XY:

255

AN XY:

727114

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000894

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00935

AC:

371

AN:

39684

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000325

AC:

AN:

86248

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53212

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000540

AC:

AN:

1111994

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00187

AC:

113

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

112

140

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000604

AC:

AN:

152364

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000631

AC XY:

AN XY:

74500

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000264

AC:

AN:

41588

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0143

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000621

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000286

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000703

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0100

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 59

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Sep 30, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

c.*2A>C in the 3'UTR of DFNB59: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 1.74% (150/8608) of East Asian chr omosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.o rg; rs200811582). -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 29, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23562982, 21935370) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.67

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

PhyloP100

2.0

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over