rs200826539

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):ā€‹c.129T>Cā€‹(p.Asp43=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000369 in 1,613,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00019 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00039 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.88
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 2-166311628-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166311628-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 332001.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-166311628-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.88 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.129T>C p.Asp43= synonymous_variant 2/27 ENST00000642356.2 NP_001352465.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.129T>C p.Asp43= synonymous_variant 2/27 NM_001365536.1 ENSP00000495601 P1Q15858-1
SCN1A-AS1ENST00000651574.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1977+15499A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000191
AC:
29
AN:
151482
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000728
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000324
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000393
AC:
98
AN:
249312
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000436
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
135252
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000129
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000993
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000389
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000425
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000495
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000387
AC:
566
AN:
1461656
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000446
AC XY:
324
AN XY:
727106
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000344
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000562
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000371
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000191
AC:
29
AN:
151482
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000189
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
73960
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000728
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000324
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000322
Hom.:
0
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000534

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 16, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2024SCN9A: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 11, 2023This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
SCN9A-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 22, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Small fiber neuropathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.90
CADD
Benign
0.089
DANN
Benign
0.38
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200826539; hg19: chr2-167168138; API