rs200826539
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):āc.129T>Cā(p.Asp43=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000369 in 1,613,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00019 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes š: 0.00039 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 synonymous
NM_001365536.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.88
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 2-166311628-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166311628-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 332001.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-166311628-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.88 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 SD gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN9A | NM_001365536.1 | c.129T>C | p.Asp43= | synonymous_variant | 2/27 | ENST00000642356.2 | NP_001352465.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN9A | ENST00000642356.2 | c.129T>C | p.Asp43= | synonymous_variant | 2/27 | NM_001365536.1 | ENSP00000495601 | P1 | ||
SCN1A-AS1 | ENST00000651574.1 | n.1977+15499A>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000191 AC: 29AN: 151482Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
29
AN:
151482
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000393 AC: 98AN: 249312Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000436 AC XY: 59AN XY: 135252
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
98
AN:
249312
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
135252
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000387 AC: 566AN: 1461656Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000446 AC XY: 324AN XY: 727106
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
566
AN:
1461656
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
324
AN XY:
727106
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000191 AC: 29AN: 151482Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000189 AC XY: 14AN XY: 73960
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
29
AN:
151482
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
73960
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | SCN9A: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 11, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
SCN9A-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 22, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Small fiber neuropathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at