Menu
GeneBe

rs200866893

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_014141.6(CNTNAP2):c.73G>A(p.Ala25Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0018 in 1,552,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00098 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CNTNAP2
NM_014141.6 missense

Scores

1
3
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.96
Variant links:
Genes affected
CNTNAP2 (HGNC:13830): (contactin associated protein 2) This gene encodes a member of the neurexin family which functions in the vertebrate nervous system as cell adhesion molecules and receptors. This protein, like other neurexin proteins, contains epidermal growth factor repeats and laminin G domains. In addition, it includes an F5/8 type C domain, discoidin/neuropilin- and fibrinogen-like domains, thrombospondin N-terminal-like domains and a putative PDZ binding site. This protein is localized at the juxtaparanodes of myelinated axons, and mediates interactions between neurons and glia during nervous system development and is also involved in localization of potassium channels within differentiating axons. This gene encompasses almost 1.5% of chromosome 7 and is one of the largest genes in the human genome. It is directly bound and regulated by forkhead box protein P2, a transcription factor related to speech and language development. This gene has been implicated in multiple neurodevelopmental disorders, including Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, schizophrenia, epilepsy, autism, ADHD and intellectual disability. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015016705).
BP6
Variant 7-146116949-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-146116949-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 166907.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=8, Likely_benign=4}. Variant chr7-146116949-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr7-146116949-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CNTNAP2NM_014141.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.73G>A p.Ala25Thr missense_variant 1/24 ENST00000361727.8
CNTNAP2XM_017011950.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.73G>A p.Ala25Thr missense_variant 1/14

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CNTNAP2ENST00000361727.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.73G>A p.Ala25Thr missense_variant 1/241 NM_014141.6 P1Q9UHC6-1
CNTNAP2ENST00000625365.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.73G>A p.Ala25Thr missense_variant 2/45
CNTNAP2ENST00000637150.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.2G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/95

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000979
AC:
149
AN:
152224
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00106
AC:
162
AN:
152620
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000956
AC XY:
78
AN XY:
81622
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000240
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00205
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000683
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00189
AC:
2646
AN:
1399776
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00181
AC XY:
1251
AN XY:
690548
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000316
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000221
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00172
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00105
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000978
AC:
149
AN:
152342
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000859
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
74504
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00218
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.000918
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00135
AC:
5
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000966
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.000320
AC:
33

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:5Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 01, 2023Reported previously in an individual with persistent developmental stuttering; however, the authors concluded that CNTNAP2 variants were not associated with stuttering (Han et al., 2014); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20711234, 25822088, 24807205, 25167861) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsMay 11, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMar 08, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 06, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicApr 13, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024CNTNAP2: BS2 -
Cortical dysplasia-focal epilepsy syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 18, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityMar 11, 2022- -
Autism, susceptibility to, 15;C2750246:Cortical dysplasia-focal epilepsy syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Intellectual disability Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCentre de Biologie Pathologie Génétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de LilleJan 01, 2019- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 06, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
CNTNAP2-related condition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 25, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.093
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.20
Cadd
Benign
21
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0061
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.11
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.064
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.59
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.44
T;.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.077
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.21
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.94
N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.66
T
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;T;.
Polyphen
0.017
.;B;B
Vest4
0.35
MVP
0.79
MPC
0.096
ClinPred
0.017
T
GERP RS
4.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.9
Varity_R
0.099
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200866893; hg19: chr7-145814041; COSMIC: COSV62185852; COSMIC: COSV62185852; API