rs200894246

Positions:

• chr16-68829771-G-A
• chr16-68829771-G-C
• chr16-68829771-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.2413G>A (p.Asp805Asn) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00207 (0.21%, 21/10,148 alleles) in the Ashkenazi Jewish subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort (BA1). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BA1. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA157966/MONDO:0007648/007

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00024 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CDH1 NM_004360.5 missense
• Clinical Significance: Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2 B:20 O:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 5.80

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5	c.2413G>A	p.Asp805Asn	missense_variant	15/16	ENST00000261769.10
CDH1	NM_001317184.2	c.2230G>A	p.Asp744Asn	missense_variant	14/15
CDH1	NM_001317185.2	c.865G>A	p.Asp289Asn	missense_variant	15/16
CDH1	NM_001317186.2	c.448G>A	p.Asp150Asn	missense_variant	14/15

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10	c.2413G>A	p.Asp805Asn	missense_variant	15/16	1	NM_004360.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000257 AC: 39 AN: 151890 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000484

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000591

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000481

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000239 AC: 60 AN: 251276 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000162 AC XY: 22 AN XY: 135822

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000405

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00198

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000211

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000243 AC: 355 AN: 1461840 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000223 AC XY: 162 AN XY: 727232

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00187

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000812

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000228

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000331

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000257 AC: 39 AN: 151890 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000270 AC XY: 20 AN XY: 74158

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000484

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000591

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000481

Alfa AF: 0.000339 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000325

TwinsUK AF: 0.000270 AC: 1

ALSPAC AF: 0.000259 AC: 1

ESP6500AA AF: 0.00 AC: 0

ESP6500EA AF: 0.000465 AC: 4

ExAC AF: 0.000222 AC: 27

EpiCase AF: 0.000273

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2 Benign:20 Other:2

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1 Benign:5

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital	Sep 09, 2020	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto	Aug 01, 2022	BA1; BS2_Suportive (PMID: 30311375) -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	research	CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington	Aug 15, 2016	Originally interpreted based on literature review PMID: 25637381. Found in a female patient having exome sequencing for an unrelated indication. No known history of diffuse gastric cancer or breast cancer. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Feb 01, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Mendelics	Aug 22, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Apr 28, 2017	This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1 Benign:4

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Dec 06, 2017	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Jan 17, 2019	This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington	Nov 20, 2015	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Oct 01, 2020	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.	May 03, 2023	- -

not specified Benign:4 Other:1

not provided, no classification provided	reference population	ITMI	Sep 19, 2013	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Nov 08, 2021	Variant summary: CDH1 c.2413G>A (p.Asp805Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin, cytoplasmic domain (IPR000233) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 251938 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 9 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.2413G>A has been reported in the literature in a family with gastric and diffuse gastric cancer in an unaffected patient; however the age was not provided (Hansford_2015). An additional CDH1 variant (c.2430delT) was also identified in a proband affected with DGC in this family. This variant was also observed associated with non-syndromic cleft-palate, Lynch Syndrome, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and NSCLC patients without strong evidence for causality (Vogelaar_2013, Yurgelun_2015, Yurgelun_2017, Rangachari_2015, Shindo_2017, Shirts_2016). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been observed at our laboratory (BRCA2 c.7618-1G>A), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Vogelaar_2013). The most pronounced variant effect results in slightly impaired cell invasion suppression, displaying smaller cellular aggregates than the WT and to result in reduced membranous E-cadherin expression while not affecting the expression level of CDH1. However, the clinical relevance of these functional impacts is uncertain. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments with a majority consensus leaning towards benign/likely benign (n=8). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital	Aug 15, 2023	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Jul 26, 2021	- -

not provided Benign:3

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Aug 01, 2022	CDH1: BP1, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 03, 2021	This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29348693, 25980754, 25862857, 24728327, 25637381, 26601054, 26845104, 26580448, 26182300, 23197654, 28135145, 28873162, 28767289) -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Jun 05, 2023

- -

CDH1-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Dec 16, 2021

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1

Benign, reviewed by expert panel

curation

ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel

Aug 08, 2023

The c.2413G>A (p.Asp805Asn) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00207 (0.21%, 21/10,148 alleles) in the Ashkenazi Jewish subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort (BA1). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BA1. -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

-

The CDH1 p.Asp805Asn variant was identified in 2 of 2886 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0007) from individuals or families with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer or Lynch syndrome and was present in 1 of 1362 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0007) from healthy individuals (Bodian 2014, Hansford 2015, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs200894246) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae; as likely benign by GeneDx and Ambry Genetics; as uncertain significance by four submitters). The variant was identified in control databases in 63 of 276968 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 2 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Latino in 13 of 34404 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), European in 26 of 126584 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Ashkenazi Jewish in 21 of 10148 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), and South Asian in 1 of 30770 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), while the variant was not observed in the African, East Asian, and Finnish, populations. One study performed in vitro functional assay (Vogelaar 2013) and found that the variant p.Asp805Asn affects E-cadherin protein function and its subcellular localization and can be considered as a pathogenic mutation however result have no additional functional work supports this claim and more over this missense variant and similar ones in this study have been found in families without a clinical phenotype suggesting that the in vitro data does not reflect the clinical impact of the variants. The p.Asp805 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Familial cancer of breast;C1708349:Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Other:1

not provided, no classification provided

phenotyping only

GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network

-

Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 04-08-2016 by Lab Quest Diagnostics. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.13
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.25	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.28
CADD	Pathogenic	30
DANN	Pathogenic	1.0
DEOGEN2	Benign	0.31	T;T;.
Eigen	Pathogenic	0.70
Eigen_PC	Pathogenic	0.75
FATHMM_MKL	Pathogenic	0.99	D
LIST_S2	Uncertain	0.90	D;D;D
M_CAP	Pathogenic	0.53	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.23	T;T;T
MetaSVM	Uncertain	-0.24	T
MutationAssessor	Benign	1.7	L;.;.
MutationTaster	Benign	1.0	D;D
PrimateAI	Uncertain	0.64	T
PROVEAN	Uncertain	-2.6	D;.;D
REVEL	Uncertain	0.37
Sift	Benign	0.049	D;.;T
Sift4G	Benign	0.12	T;T;T
Polyphen		1.0	D;.;.
Vest4		0.52
MVP		0.94
MPC		0.89
ClinPred		0.19	T
GERP RS		6.0
Varity_R		0.22
gMVP		0.67

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200894246; hg19: chr16-68863674;