rs200929621

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.2404A>G​(p.Ser802Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000986 in 1,612,754 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S802R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

4
15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.45
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.10086098).
BP6
Variant 16-2074248-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2074248-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 406060.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-2074248-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000394 (6/152342) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00116 (6/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000503. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkc.2404A>G p.Ser802Gly missense_variant Exon 22 of 42 ENST00000219476.9 NP_000539.2 P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkc.2404A>G p.Ser802Gly missense_variant Exon 22 of 42 5 NM_000548.5 ENSP00000219476.3 P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152224
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000400
AC:
10
AN:
250296
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135652
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000105
AC:
153
AN:
1460412
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000109
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
726522
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00378
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152342
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.0000741
AC:
9
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 21, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 13, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Mar 07, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 18, 2022
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

not specified Benign:1
Dec 28, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Computational tools predict this amino acid change may be benign. -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

TSC2-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 15, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.059
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.16
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.13
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.61
D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D;.;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.18
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.034
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.073
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.10
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.28
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L;.;.;.;L;L;.;.;.;L;.;L;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;.;.;N;.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.35
Sift
Benign
0.051
T;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.21
T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T
Polyphen
0.16
B;.;.;.;B;B;.;.;B;B;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.33
MutPred
0.50
Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);.;Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);.;Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);.;
MVP
0.77
ClinPred
0.083
T
GERP RS
4.2
Varity_R
0.15
gMVP
0.31

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200929621; hg19: chr16-2124249; API