rs200929621

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 2P and 18B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.2404A>G(p.Ser802Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000986 in 1,612,754 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S802N) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.45

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tuberous sclerosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
tuberous sclerosis 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
tuberous sclerosis complex
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TSC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 10 benign, 28 uncertain in NM_000548.5

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.10086098).

BP6

Variant 16-2074248-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2074248-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 406060.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000394 (6/152342) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00116 (6/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000503. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC2	NM_000548.5 link	c.2404A>G	p.Ser802Gly	missense_variant	Exon 22 of 42	ENST00000219476.9	NP_000539.2	P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC2	ENST00000219476.9 link	c.2404A>G	p.Ser802Gly	missense_variant	Exon 22 of 42	5	NM_000548.5	ENSP00000219476.3		P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152224

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000400

AC:

AN:

250296

AF XY:

0.0000221

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000105

AC:

153

AN:

1460412

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000109

AC XY:

AN XY:

726522

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33458

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44714

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00378

AC:

150

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86234

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52516

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5334

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

8.99e-7

AC:

AN:

1111986

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60336

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152342

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74498

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41580

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00116

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.483

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000358

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ExAC

AF:

0.0000741

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:3

Jan 21, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 13, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Mar 07, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 18, 2022

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Dec 28, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Computational tools predict this amino acid change may be benign. -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

TSC2-related disorder

Benign:1

Feb 15, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.059

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.16

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.13

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.61

D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D;.;D

Eigen

Benign

-0.18

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.034

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Benign

0.79

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.073

MetaRNN

Benign

0.10

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.28

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.5

L;.;.;.;L;L;.;.;.;L;.;L;.;.;.

PhyloP100

4.5

PrimateAI

Benign

0.32

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.6

N;.;.;N;.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.;.;.;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.35

Sift

Benign

0.051

T;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.21

T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T

Polyphen

0.16

B;.;.;.;B;B;.;.;B;B;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.33

MutPred

0.50

Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);.;Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);.;Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);Loss of catalytic residue at S802 (P = 0.067);.;

MVP

0.77

ClinPred

0.083

GERP RS

4.2

Varity_R

0.15

gMVP

0.31

Mutation Taster

=78/22

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over