rs200942733
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000143.4(FH):c.-11C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00164 in 1,525,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000143.4 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancerInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- fumaric aciduriaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- leiomyosarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000143.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00106 AC: 161AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000943 AC: 129AN: 136854 AF XY: 0.000910 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00171 AC: 2342AN: 1373602Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00167 AC XY: 1123AN XY: 674056 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00106 AC: 161AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000807 AC XY: 60AN XY: 74380 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at