Menu
GeneBe

rs200959196

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001042413.2(GLIS3):​c.1154G>T​(p.Gly385Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000288 in 1,574,282 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G385S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GLIS3
NM_001042413.2 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.450
Variant links:
Genes affected
GLIS3 (HGNC:28510): (GLIS family zinc finger 3) This gene is a member of the GLI-similar zinc finger protein family and encodes a nuclear protein with five C2H2-type zinc finger domains. This protein functions as both a repressor and activator of transcription and is specifically involved in the development of pancreatic beta cells, the thyroid, eye, liver and kidney. Mutations in this gene have been associated with neonatal diabetes and congenital hypothyroidism (NDH). Alternatively spliced variants that encode different protein isoforms have been described but the full-length nature of only two have been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.017202407).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000177 (27/152224) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000353 (24/68024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000243. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 8 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GLIS3NM_001042413.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1154G>T p.Gly385Val missense_variant 4/11 ENST00000381971.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GLIS3ENST00000381971.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1154G>T p.Gly385Val missense_variant 4/115 NM_001042413.2 P1Q8NEA6-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000177
AC:
27
AN:
152224
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000205
AC:
36
AN:
175834
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000164
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
97470
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000111
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000248
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000356
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000419
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000300
AC:
427
AN:
1422058
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.000291
AC XY:
205
AN XY:
704866
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000613
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000374
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000102
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000177
AC:
27
AN:
152224
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000108
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.000128
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000185
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000147
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000151
AC:
17

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neonatal diabetes mellitus with congenital hypothyroidism Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsJul 07, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchClinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic-Potent mutations in GLIS3 predisposes to neonatal diabetes mellitus with an extra pancreatic manifestation of hypothyroidism. It also predisposes to early onset diabetes in adults.However no sufficient evidence is found to ascertain the role of this particular variant rs200959196, yet. -
Monogenic diabetes Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchPersonalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of MedicineAug 01, 2017ACMG Criteria:BP4 (9 predictors) -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeMar 27, 2022This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 230 of the GLIS3 protein (p.Gly230Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs200959196, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with GLIS3-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 549531). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
5.1
DANN
Benign
0.30
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.063
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.86
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.86
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.29
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0056
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.017
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.69
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.052
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.66
T;T
Polyphen
0.0010
B;B
Vest4
0.16
MVP
0.36
MPC
0.029
ClinPred
0.011
T
GERP RS
2.4
Varity_R
0.043
gMVP
0.44

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200959196; hg19: chr9-4118324; API