rs201029723
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.24815G>A(p.Arg8272Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000712 in 1,614,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000058 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
SYNE1
NM_182961.4 missense
NM_182961.4 missense
Scores
3
8
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.86
Genes affected
SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), SYNE1. . Gene score misZ -0.29069 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.2909 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type, autosomal recessive myogenic arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita 3, myogenic type, autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018112421).
BP6
Variant 6-152148206-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-152148206-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 212341.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 30 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | NM_182961.4 | c.24815G>A | p.Arg8272Gln | missense_variant | 137/146 | ENST00000367255.10 | NP_892006.3 | |
SYNE1 | NM_001347702.2 | c.1280G>A | p.Arg427Gln | missense_variant | 8/18 | ENST00000354674.5 | NP_001334631.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | ENST00000367255.10 | c.24815G>A | p.Arg8272Gln | missense_variant | 137/146 | 1 | NM_182961.4 | ENSP00000356224.5 | ||
SYNE1 | ENST00000354674.5 | c.1280G>A | p.Arg427Gln | missense_variant | 8/18 | 5 | NM_001347702.2 | ENSP00000346701.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
30
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000247 AC: 62AN: 251250Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000199 AC XY: 27AN XY: 135804
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
62
AN:
251250
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
135804
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000581 AC: 85AN: 1461864Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000536 AC XY: 39AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
85
AN:
1461864
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
727232
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152326Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000201 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74490
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
30
AN:
152326
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74490
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
26
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 10, 2014 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 20, 2024 | Observed in unrelated patients with sporadic dilated cardiomyopathy in published literature (PMID: 28398466); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28398466) - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 07, 2023 | - - |
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.;T;T;T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
N;.;D;D;N;D;D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;.;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;T;T;D;T;T
Polyphen
D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at