rs201035511
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.54818C>T(p.Pro18273Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00063 in 1,503,086 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.54818C>T | p.Pro18273Leu | missense_variant | Exon 283 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.54818C>T | p.Pro18273Leu | missense_variant | Exon 283 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000481 AC: 73AN: 151728Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000411 AC: 51AN: 124118Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000441 AC XY: 29AN XY: 65804
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000647 AC: 874AN: 1351240Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000648 AC XY: 430AN XY: 663332
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000481 AC: 73AN: 151846Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000445 AC XY: 33AN XY: 74194
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Pro15705Leu v ariant in TTN has been identified by our laboratory in 1 Caucasian adult with DC M, who carried a pathogenic variant in a different gene. This variant has been i dentified in 0.1% (16/16210) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Co nsortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201035511). Computationa l prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Pro15705Leu vari ant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summary, while the clinical significance of the p.Pr o15705Leu variant is uncertain, its frequency suggests that it is more likely to be benign. -
Variant summary: TTN c.47114C>T (p.Pro15705Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the A-band of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00041 in 124118 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00079 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.26 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.00063), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.47114C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and Atrial fibrillation without evidence of co-segregation (van Lint_2019, Maltese_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments, VUS and likely benign/benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
TTN-related disorder Uncertain:1
The TTN c.54818C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Pro18273Leu. This variant was reported as a variant of uncertain significance in two individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy (described as p.(Pro15705Leu) in Supplementary file 2, van Lint et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 30847666). This variant is reported in 0.093% of alleles in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent in gnomAD, including one homozygous individual (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/2-179467311-G-A). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
- -
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at