rs201074268

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):​c.3311G>A​(p.Gly1104Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00277 in 1,614,028 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G1104S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0029 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.53

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
ALMS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Alstrom syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0048203766).
BP6
Variant 2-73449838-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73449838-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 387328.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.002 (305/152232) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00284 (193/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00251. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 172 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkc.3311G>A p.Gly1104Asp missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 ENST00000613296.6 NP_001365383.1
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkc.3311G>A p.Gly1104Asp missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 NP_055935.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkc.3311G>A p.Gly1104Asp missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 1 NM_001378454.1 ENSP00000482968.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00201
AC:
305
AN:
152114
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000628
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00197
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00395
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00284
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00188
AC:
468
AN:
248562
AF XY:
0.00197
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000324
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00385
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00215
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00285
AC:
4172
AN:
1461796
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
0.00271
AC XY:
1971
AN XY:
727202
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000478
AC:
16
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00125
AC:
56
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00157
AC:
41
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000255
AC:
22
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00346
AC:
185
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000693
AC:
4
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
3679
AN:
1111954
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00278
AC:
168
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
291
583
874
1166
1457
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
142
284
426
568
710
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00200
AC:
305
AN:
152232
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00231
AC XY:
172
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000626
AC:
26
AN:
41526
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00196
AC:
30
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000865
AC:
3
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000622
AC:
3
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00395
AC:
42
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
193
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00379
AC:
8
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15
30
46
61
76
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00246
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00187
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00431
AC:
16
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00545
AC:
21
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00256
AC:
21
ExAC
AF:
0.00168
AC:
203
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Mar 18, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ALMS1: BP4 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Alstrom syndrome Benign:3
Feb 01, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Potent mutations in ALMS1 are associated with a rare condition called Alstrom syndrome. It can cause excessive eating, insulin resistance. However, no evidence is found to ascertain the role of rs201074268 in Alstrom syndrome yet. -

not specified Benign:2
Feb 06, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: ALMS1 c.3308G>A/p.Gly1103Asp (also known as c.3314G>A in RefSeq) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Alstrom syndrome repeat (IPR040972) of the encoded protein sequence. Two of three in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0019 in 248562 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0026 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ALMS1 causing Alstrom Syndrome phenotype (0.0014), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. Although the variant has been reported in a paper describing the mutational spectrum of Alstrom syndrome, this publication provides no primary evidence supporting a pathogenic outcome (Marshall_2015). To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3308G>A in individuals affected with Alstrom Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been observed at our laboratory (TTR c.424G>A , p.Val1421Ile), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Dec 26, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Jan 25, 2019
Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

ACMG criteria: BP4 (8 predictors + REVEL score 0.117), BS2 (1 homozygotes in gnomAD), BP1 (missense when truncating are cause of disease)= benign -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 26, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.50
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
0.0020
DANN
Benign
0.30
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.014
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-2.0
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0062
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.038
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0043
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0048
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
PhyloP100
-4.5
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.48
T;T;T
Vest4
0.14
MVP
0.088
ClinPred
0.0075
T
GERP RS
-8.9
PromoterAI
-0.0094
Neutral
Varity_R
0.055
gMVP
0.040
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201074268; hg19: chr2-73676965; COSMIC: COSV52507753; COSMIC: COSV52507753; API