rs201097154
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_181426.2(CCDC39):c.2557C>T(p.Arg853Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000234 in 1,584,308 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R853H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_181426.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_181426.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDC39 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.2557C>T | p.Arg853Cys | missense | Exon 18 of 20 | ENSP00000417960.2 | Q9UFE4-1 | ||
| TTC14 | TSL:1 | c.1775-835G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000372027.4 | Q96N46-2 | |||
| CCDC39 | c.2464C>T | p.Arg822Cys | missense | Exon 17 of 19 | ENSP00000606126.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000263 AC: 40AN: 152014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000354 AC: 81AN: 229114 AF XY: 0.000371 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000231 AC: 331AN: 1432294Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000239 AC XY: 170AN XY: 710348 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000263 AC: 40AN: 152014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74260 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at