rs201143561

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001111.5(ADAR):​c.772G>A​(p.Gly258Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000571 in 1,614,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G258G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00059 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

ADAR
NM_001111.5 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.82

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ADAR (HGNC:225): (adenosine deaminase RNA specific) This gene encodes the enzyme responsible for RNA editing by site-specific deamination of adenosines. This enzyme destabilizes double-stranded RNA through conversion of adenosine to inosine. Mutations in this gene have been associated with dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2010]
ADAR Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 6
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • familial infantile bilateral striatal necrosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Leigh syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0037381947).
BP6
Variant 1-154601870-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-154601870-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 292782.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000414 (63/152276) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00104 (5/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000408. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 41 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ADARNM_001111.5 linkc.772G>A p.Gly258Arg missense_variant Exon 2 of 15 ENST00000368474.9 NP_001102.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ADARENST00000368474.9 linkc.772G>A p.Gly258Arg missense_variant Exon 2 of 15 1 NM_001111.5 ENSP00000357459.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000421
AC:
64
AN:
152160
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000736
AC:
185
AN:
251476
AF XY:
0.000795
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00351
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000325
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000588
AC:
859
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
89
AF XY:
0.000623
AC XY:
453
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000597
AC:
2
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00199
AC:
172
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00303
AC:
162
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000435
AC:
484
AN:
1112010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000580
AC:
35
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000414
AC:
63
AN:
152276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000551
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000963
AC:
4
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000654
AC:
1
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
5
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00245
AC:
26
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000382
AC:
26
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000474
AC:
1
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
7
10
14
17
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000404
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000181
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000581
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.000799
AC:
97
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 6 Benign:1
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

ADAR-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 12, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Symmetrical dyschromatosis of extremities;C3539013:Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 6 Benign:1
Dec 27, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Mar 23, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Symmetrical dyschromatosis of extremities Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.74
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
0.16
DANN
Benign
0.64
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.30
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.7
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.8
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.022
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.43
.;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.013
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0037
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.55
N;N;N
PhyloP100
-1.8
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.43
N;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.0020
Sift
Benign
0.58
T;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.28
T;.;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;B
Vest4
0.035
MutPred
0.26
Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0071);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0071);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0071);
MVP
0.082
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
0.0048
T
GERP RS
-5.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.025
gMVP
0.24
Mutation Taster
=290/10
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201143561; hg19: chr1-154574346; API