rs201147123

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_017890.5(VPS13B):c.358A>G(p.Ile120Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000582 in 1,614,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I120N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00035 ( 3 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00061 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

VPS13B
NM_017890.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.21

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

VPS13B (HGNC:2183): (vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog B) This gene encodes a potential transmembrane protein that may function in vesicle-mediated transport and sorting of proteins within the cell. This protein may play a role in the development and the function of the eye, hematological system, and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Cohen syndrome. Multiple splice variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

VPS13B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Cohen syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, ClinGen

VPS13B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008949667).

BP6

Variant 8-99096378-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-99096378-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 212575.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000348 (53/152324) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0058 (28/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00413. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 31 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
VPS13B	NM_017890.5 link	c.358A>G	p.Ile120Val	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 62	ENST00000358544.7	NP_060360.3
VPS13B	NM_152564.5 link	c.358A>G	p.Ile120Val	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 62	ENST00000357162.7	NP_689777.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
VPS13B	ENST00000358544.7 link	c.358A>G	p.Ile120Val	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 62	1	NM_017890.5	ENSP00000351346.2
VPS13B	ENST00000357162.7 link	c.358A>G	p.Ile120Val	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 62	1	NM_152564.5	ENSP00000349685.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000348

AC:

AN:

152206

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00720

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00580

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00118

AC:

296

AN:

251342

AF XY:

0.00158

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00536

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000106

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000606

AC:

886

AN:

1461850

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000829

AC XY:

603

AN XY:

727230

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00696

AC:

182

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00737

AC:

636

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000867

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000216

AC:

AN:

1111980

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000646

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.465

Heterozygous variant carriers

145

193

241

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000348

AC:

AN:

152324

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000416

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41576

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00720

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00580

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68024

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000268

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000230

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00133

AC:

161

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cohen syndrome

Benign:4

Dr.Nikuei Genetic Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Jun 25, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Apr 24, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

VPS13B: BP4, BS2 -

VPS13B-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 25, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.052

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.55

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

0.20

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.79

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.037

.;.;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.77

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.65

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.17

LIST_S2

Benign

0.74

T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.016

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0089

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.92

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.0

N;N;N;N

PhyloP100

1.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.22

PROVEAN

Benign

0.070

N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.10

Sift

Benign

0.89

T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;B;B;B

Vest4

0.073

MVP

0.35

MPC

0.10

ClinPred

0.0087

GERP RS

-0.11

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.015

gMVP

0.077

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over