Menu
GeneBe

rs201148126

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4BP6BS1BS2

The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.850G>A(p.Gly284Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00091 in 1,551,332 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G284E) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00046 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00096 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RBM20
NM_001134363.3 missense

Scores

1
10
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.51
Variant links:
Genes affected
RBM20 (HGNC:27424): (RNA binding motif protein 20) This gene encodes a protein that binds RNA and regulates splicing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.29439023).
BP6
Variant 10-110781459-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110781459-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 44028.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=4}. Variant chr10-110781459-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr10-110781459-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00046 (70/152178) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000838 (57/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000664. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 26 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 70 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RBM20NM_001134363.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.850G>A p.Gly284Arg missense_variant 2/14 ENST00000369519.4
RBM20XM_017016103.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.685G>A p.Gly229Arg missense_variant 2/14
RBM20XM_017016104.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.466G>A p.Gly156Arg missense_variant 2/14
RBM20XM_047425116.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.466G>A p.Gly156Arg missense_variant 2/14

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RBM20ENST00000369519.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.850G>A p.Gly284Arg missense_variant 2/141 NM_001134363.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000460
AC:
70
AN:
152178
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000838
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000332
AC:
51
AN:
153600
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000282
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
81524
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000405
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000439
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000789
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000462
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000959
AC:
1342
AN:
1399154
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000894
AC XY:
617
AN XY:
690090
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000949
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000280
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000379
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000816
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00120
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000655
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000460
AC:
70
AN:
152178
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000350
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74344
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000838
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000799
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000431
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00216
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000723
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000629
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.000372
AC:
9

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 17, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 16, 2023- -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 26, 2023Reported in patients with cardiomyopathy and in one case of SIDS; however, some of these individuals harbored additional variants in cardiogenetic genes (Lopes et al., 2013; van Lint et al., 2019; Gaertner et al., 2020; Neubauer et al., 2017); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30847666, 32840935, 30871351, 28074886, 23396983) -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedprovider interpretationStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityAug 08, 2017- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 28, 2022Variant summary: RBM20 c.850G>A (p.Gly284Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00033 in 153600 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00079 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 17-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RBM20 causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy phenotype (4.7e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.850G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, sudden infant death syndrome and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (Lopes_2013, Neubauer_2017, van Lint_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Co-occurrences with pathogenic variants have been reported (MYBPC3 c.1624+4A>T; MYBPC3 c.1624G>C, p.E542Q; Lopes_2013 and Internal testing), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign and eight ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite it as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 08, 2017Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Gly284Arg var iant in RBM20 has been identified by our laboratory in 1 Caucasian adult with fe atures of DCM and ARVC. It has also been identified in 0.07% (53/71906) of Europ ean chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadi nstitute.org; dbSNP rs201148126). Computational prediction tools and conservatio n analysis do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein . In summary, while the clinical significance of the p.Gly284Arg variant is unce rtain, its frequency suggests that it is more likely to be benign. ACMG/AMP Crit eria applied: BS1. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioFeb 21, 2023- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 21, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.29
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.16
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.010
Cadd
Uncertain
23
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.42
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.47
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.22
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.29
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.57
D
MutationTaster
Benign
0.92
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.1
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.44
Sift
Benign
0.14
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0090
D
Vest4
0.55
MutPred
0.18
Loss of methylation at K280 (P = 0.073);
MVP
0.78
ClinPred
0.42
T
GERP RS
5.3
gMVP
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201148126; hg19: chr10-112541217; COSMIC: COSV65705826; API