rs201158177

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2_Supporting

The NM_000071.3(CBS):c.1145+7C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0031 ( 1 hom., cov: 0)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0051 ( 3 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

CBS
NM_000071.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0002891

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.961

Variant links:

Genes affected

CBS (HGNC:1550): (cystathionine beta-synthase) The protein encoded by this gene acts as a homotetramer to catalyze the conversion of homocysteine to cystathionine, the first step in the transsulfuration pathway. The encoded protein is allosterically activated by adenosyl-methionine and uses pyridoxal phosphate as a cofactor. Defects in this gene can cause cystathionine beta-synthase deficiency (CBSD), which can lead to homocystinuria. This gene is a major contributor to cellular hydrogen sulfide production. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2016]

CBS links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).

BP6

Variant 21-43060434-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr21-43060434-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136674.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr21-43060434-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr21-43060434-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr21-43060434-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00505 (99/19600) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0125 (1/80). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0062. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 47 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 0. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CBS	NM_000071.3 link	c.1145+7C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 12 of 16	ENST00000398165.8	NP_000062.1	P35520-1Q9NTF0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CBS	ENST00000398165.8 link	c.1145+7C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 12 of 16	1	NM_000071.3	ENSP00000381231.4		P35520-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

968

Hom.:

Cov.:

FAILED QC

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00937

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00606

AC:

1512

AN:

249694

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00616

AC XY:

834

AN XY:

135452

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000619

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00191

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00159

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000555

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0279

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00698

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00458

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00505

AC:

AN:

19600

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00432

AC XY:

AN XY:

10886

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00121

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000247

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0241

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00754

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00200

GnomAD4 genome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR

AF:

0.00308

AC:

AN:

974

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00607

AC XY:

AN XY:

494

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00943

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00628

Hom.:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00578

EpiControl

AF:

0.00522

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:6

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Oct 18, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CBS: BP4, BS2 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:5

Mar 28, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 20, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 20, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CBS c.1145+7C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0061 in 249694 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.007 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CBS causing Homocystinuria phenotype (0.003), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.1145+7C>T has been reported in the literature (Wesolowska-Andersen_2015). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Classic homocystinuria

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

HYPERHOMOCYSTEINEMIA, THROMBOTIC, CBS-RELATED

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.89

CADD

Benign

0.28

DANN

Benign

0.37

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00029

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0020

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over