rs201161155
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_080390.4(TCEAL2):c.14T>A(p.Phe5Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000115 in 1,203,862 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 44 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. F5C) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_080390.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_080390.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCEAL2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.14T>A | p.Phe5Tyr | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000361866.1 | Q9H3H9 | ||
| TCEAL2 | TSL:1 | n.799T>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 2 | |||||
| TCEAL2 | TSL:5 | c.14T>A | p.Phe5Tyr | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000332359.2 | Q9H3H9 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000445 AC: 5AN: 112249Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000398 AC: 7AN: 175852 AF XY: 0.0000482 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000123 AC: 134AN: 1091558Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000117 AC XY: 42AN XY: 359426 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000445 AC: 5AN: 112304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.0000580 AC XY: 2AN XY: 34512 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at