rs201185279
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_006031.6(PCNT):āc.7459C>Gā(p.Leu2487Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000109 in 1,613,744 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006031.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCNT | NM_006031.6 | c.7459C>G | p.Leu2487Val | missense_variant | 34/47 | ENST00000359568.10 | NP_006022.3 | |
PCNT | NM_001315529.2 | c.7105C>G | p.Leu2369Val | missense_variant | 34/47 | NP_001302458.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCNT | ENST00000359568.10 | c.7459C>G | p.Leu2487Val | missense_variant | 34/47 | 1 | NM_006031.6 | ENSP00000352572.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152206Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000434 AC: 109AN: 251100Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000361 AC XY: 49AN XY: 135790
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000999 AC: 146AN: 1461420Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000990 AC XY: 72AN XY: 726998
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152324Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000269 AC XY: 20AN XY: 74486
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 20, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
PCNT-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 03, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at