rs201189784
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):āc.23278A>Gā(p.Asn7760Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000338 in 1,613,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N7760S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164507.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.23278A>G | p.Asn7760Asp | missense_variant | Exon 161 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
| NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.23278A>G | p.Asn7760Asp | missense_variant | Exon 161 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000209 AC: 52AN: 248822 AF XY: 0.000200 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000350 AC: 511AN: 1461440Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000323 AC XY: 235AN XY: 726984 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000255 AC XY: 19AN XY: 74488 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4
- -
- -
NEB: PM2, BP1 -
The N7795D variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The N7795D variant is observed in 4/6,396 (0.06%) alleles from individuals of European background (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). This substitution occurs at a position where amino acids with similar properties to Asparagine are tolerated across species. However, this variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. In silico analysis predicts this variant is probably damaging to the protein structure/function. -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Variant summary: NEB c.23383A>G (p.Asn7795Asp) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00023 in 280218 control chromosomes (gnomAD), predominantly at a frequency of 0.00039 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in NEB causing Nemaline Myopathy 2 (0.00023 vs 0.0035), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.23383A>G in individuals affected with Nemaline Myopathy 2 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Five ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: four classified the variant as uncertain significance, and one as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
- -
Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.18175A>G (p.N6059D) alteration is located in exon 134 (coding exon 132) of the NEB gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 18175, causing the asparagine (N) at amino acid position 6059 to be replaced by an aspartic acid (D). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at