rs201199629
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.9086G>A(p.Gly3029Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00039 in 1,614,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00015 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00042 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
ATM
NM_000051.4 missense
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
1
3
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.45
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
C11orf65 (HGNC:28519): (chromosome 11 open reading frame 65) Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of mitochondrial fission and negative regulation of protein targeting to mitochondrion. Predicted to be located in cytosol and mitochondrial outer membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.21475926).
BP6
Variant 11-108365423-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108365423-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127468.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=16, not_provided=1, Benign=1}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.9086G>A | p.Gly3029Asp | missense_variant | 63/63 | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.9086G>A | p.Gly3029Asp | missense_variant | 63/63 | NM_000051.4 | ENSP00000501606.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
23
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000127 AC: 32AN: 251462Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000110 AC XY: 15AN XY: 135904
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
32
AN:
251462
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
135904
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000415 AC: 607AN: 1461884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000413 AC XY: 300AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
607
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
300
AN XY:
727242
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 13AN XY: 74332
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
23
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74332
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
AC:
18
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:20Benign:4Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:8
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 01, 2024 | Reported in a multi-ethnic exome array study; however, no statistically significant association with breast cancer was identified after correcting for multiple comparisons (PMID: 23555315); Reported in individuals with breast, ovarian, colorectal, pancreatic, and other cancers, but also observed in control subjects (PMID: 19781682, 26689913, 28779002, 27978560, 28652578, 28135145, 28726808, 29522266, 29684080, 33134171, 35264596, 35534704, 32885271, 25186627, 20305132, 34326862, 35047863); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19781682, 21787400, 26689913, 26787654, 27978560, 28779002, 28135145, 28726808, 26917275, 29522266, 29684080, 28652578, 25759019, 33134171, 35047863, 35264596, 32885271, 20305132, 35534704, 34326862, 25186627, 23532176, Kamgar[CaseReport]2023, 23555315) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 18, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Aug 10, 2022 | BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 25, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:4Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jul 05, 2019 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | May 13, 2021 | The ATM c.9086G>A (p.Gly3029Asp) missense change has a maximum frequency of 0.025% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/11-108236150-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). Seven of seven in silico tools predict a benign effect of this variant on protein function (BP4), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. This variant has been reported in individuals with cancer including breast cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and rectal cancer (PS4; PMID: 19781682, 27978560, 28135145, 26689913, 23555315, 21787400). This variant is present 10x in the FLOSSIES database which contains genetic variants from women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (BS2; https://whi.color.com/). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: PS4, BS2, BP4. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 04, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jul 02, 2018 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 29, 2021 | DNA sequence analysis of the ATM gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.9086G>A, in exon 63 that results in an amino acid change, p.Gly3029Asp. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.025% in the non-Finnish European subpopulation (dbSNP rs201199629). The p.Gly3029Asp change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the ATM protein that is known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Gly3029Asp substitution. This sequence change has previously been identified in individuals with breast and other cancers, as well as in populations of healthy controls (PMID: 19781682, 28779002, 29522266, 27978560, 33134171, 28135145, 28726808, Flossies’s database https://whi.color.com/gene/ENSG00000149311). Due to insufficient evidence and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Gly3029Asp change remains unknown at this time. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 03, 2024 | Variant summary: ATM c.9086G>A (p.Gly3029Asp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Phosphatidylinositol 3-/4-kinase, catalytic domain (IPR000403) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00013 in 256260 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Ataxia-Telangiectasia, allowing no conclusion about variant significance. However, this variant has also been reported in 2/2559 African American women and 8/7325 European American women (i.e. with an allele frequency of 0.001012 in 9884 subjects) who were older than age 70 and cancer free (FLOSSIES database), supporting a benign role for the variant. c.9086G>A has been reported in the literature as a VUS in individuals undergoing multigene panel testing for a variety of cancer types and has recently been reported to not segregate with disease in at-least one family with a history of breast/colorectal cancer (example, Bernstein_2010, Lu_2015, Pearlman_2016, Tavtigian_2009, Tung_2015, Yurgelun_2017, Jesinghaus_2016, Grasel_2020, de Oliveira_2022, Guindalini_2022). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Ataxia-Telangiectasia. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 20305132, 33134171, 35264596, 26917275, 26689913, 27978560, 19781682, 25186627, 26787654, 28135145, 35534704). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127468). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 12, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 08, 2023 | The p.G3029D variant (also known as c.9086G>A), located in coding exon 62 of the ATM gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 9086. The glycine at codon 3029 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant has been identified in numerous disease cohorts as well as unaffected control groups across studies (Tavtigian SV et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009 Oct;85:427-46; Decker BJ et al. Med. Genet. 2017 Nov;54(11):732-741; Pearlman R et al. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr;3:464-71; Chaffee KG et al. Genet. Med. 2018 01;20(1):119-127; Hauke J et al. Cancer Med. 2018 Apr;7(4):1349-1358; Lerner-Ellis J et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2021 Mar;147:871-879; Guindalini RSC et al. Sci Rep, 2022 Mar;12:4190). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 23, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | MGZ Medical Genetics Center | Mar 07, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Jun 24, 2024 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 05, 2023 | - - |
ATM-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 30, 2023 | The ATM c.9086G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Gly3029Asp. This variant has been reported in individuals with a history of breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancers (Table S2, Tavtigian et al. 2009. PubMed ID: 19781682; Supplementary Data 12, Lu et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26689913; eTable 2, Pearlman et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 27978560; Table A4, Yurgelun et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28135145), but has also been identified in control cohorts (Table S2, Tavtigian et al. 2009. PubMed ID: 19781682). This variant is reported in 0.025% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/11-108236150-G-A) and has conflicting interpretations regarding its pathogenicity in ClinVar, ranging from benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/127468/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital | Aug 01, 2020 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome;C0006142:Malignant tumor of breast Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network | - | Variant interpreted as Likely benign and reported on 10-21-2019 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;.
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
B;B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at