rs201236828

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 2P and 12B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_002458.3(MUC5B):c.9140C>A(p.Thr3047Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.022 in 1,590,254 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.019 ( 0 hom., cov: 29)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MUC5B
NM_002458.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.239

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MUC5B (HGNC:7516): (mucin 5B, oligomeric mucus/gel-forming) This gene encodes a member of the mucin family of proteins, which are highly glycosylated macromolecular components of mucus secretions. This family member is the major gel-forming mucin in mucus. It is a major contributor to the lubricating and viscoelastic properties of whole saliva, normal lung mucus and cervical mucus. This gene has been found to be up-regulated in some human diseases, including sinus mucosa of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), CRS with nasal polyposis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and H. pylori-associated gastric disease, and it may be involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2010]

MUC5B links:

MUC5B-AS1 (HGNC:53936): (MUC5B antisense RNA 1)

MUC5B-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

new If you want to explore the variant's impact on the transcript NM_002458.3, check out the Mutation Effect Viewer. This is especially useful for frameshift variants or if you want to visualize the effect of exon loss / intron retention.

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

PM2

Variant has high frequency in the NFE (0.0233) population. However there is too low homozygotes in high coverage region: (expected more than 191, got 0).

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0032743812).

BP6

Variant 11-1246020-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-1246020-C-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 403186.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002458.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	MUC5B	NM_002458.3	MANE Select	c.9140C>A	p.Thr3047Asn	missense	Exon 31 of 49	NP_002449.2	Q9HC84
	MUC5B-AS1	NR_157183.1		n.57-3382G>T		intron	N/A

Ensembl Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	MUC5B	ENST00000529681.5	TSL:5 MANE Select	c.9140C>A	p.Thr3047Asn	missense	Exon 31 of 49	ENSP00000436812.1	Q9HC84
	MUC5B-AS1	ENST00000532061.2	TSL:5	n.57-3382G>T		intron	N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0194

AC:

2923

AN:

150334

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00539

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00547

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0250

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00648

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0579

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0278

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0155

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0224

AC:

5542

AN:

247340

AF XY:

0.0222

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00554

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00432

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0227

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0658

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0296

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.0245

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0222

AC:

31999

AN:

1439802

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0220

AC XY:

15786

AN XY:

716818

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00307

AC:

102

AN:

33242

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00435

AC:

194

AN:

44610

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0233

AC:

603

AN:

25832

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00751

AC:

645

AN:

85934

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0651

AC:

3433

AN:

52754

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00313

AC:

AN:

5750

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0236

AC:

25744

AN:

1092294

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0211

AC:

1260

AN:

59686

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.262

Heterozygous variant carriers

3374

6748

10121

13495

16869

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

868

1736

2604

3472

4340

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0194

AC:

2923

AN:

150452

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0197

AC XY:

1445

AN XY:

73482

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00537

AC:

220

AN:

40952

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00546

AC:

AN:

15206

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0250

AC:

AN:

3446

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

5102

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00649

AC:

AN:

4780

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0579

AC:

601

AN:

10378

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0278

AC:

1868

AN:

67290

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0153

AC:

AN:

2092

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.311

Heterozygous variant carriers

186

371

557

742

928

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

108

144

180

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0246

Hom.:

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Likely benign

Revision:criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not provided (1)

not specified (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.72

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.63

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.022

Eigen

Benign

-0.17

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.40

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.13

LIST_S2

Benign

0.39

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0033

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.3

PhyloP100

0.24

PrimateAI

Benign

0.29

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.98

REVEL

Benign

0.10

Sift

Benign

0.12

Varity_R

0.054

gMVP

0.22

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

MaxEntScan Visualizer can be used to analyze the impact of this mutation on the neighboring sequence.

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over