rs201275730
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 3P and 16B. PM1PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_004595.5(SMS):c.569C>T(p.Thr190Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000132 in 1,206,163 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. There are 53 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004595.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- syndromic X-linked intellectual disability Snyder typeInheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004595.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMS | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.569C>T | p.Thr190Ile | missense | Exon 6 of 11 | ENSP00000385746.2 | P52788-1 | ||
| SMS | c.569C>T | p.Thr190Ile | missense | Exon 6 of 12 | ENSP00000523948.1 | ||||
| SMS | c.569C>T | p.Thr190Ile | missense | Exon 6 of 12 | ENSP00000625958.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000896 AC: 10AN: 111610Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000185 AC: 34AN: 183493 AF XY: 0.000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000136 AC: 149AN: 1094497Hom.: 1 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000131 AC XY: 47AN XY: 359929 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000896 AC: 10AN: 111666Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000177 AC XY: 6AN XY: 33834 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at