rs201295052

Variant names:

• chr12-88117128-G-A
• rs201295052
• NM_025114.4:c.1729C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):​c.1729C>T​(p.Leu577Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000186 in 1,535,606 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CEP290 NM_025114.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10 B:5
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0420

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
• BP6: Variant 12-88117128-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88117128-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 388113.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=10, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr12-88117128-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.042 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4	c.1729C>T	p.Leu577Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 54	ENST00000552810.6	NP_079390.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6	c.1729C>T	p.Leu577Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 54	1	NM_025114.4	ENSP00000448012.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000204 AC: 31 AN: 151970 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000242

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000263

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00461

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000132

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000309 AC: 53 AN: 171714 AF XY: 0.000298

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000157

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00283

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000231

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000849

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000184 AC: 255 AN: 1383636 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.000196 AC XY: 134 AN XY: 685254

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000949 AC: 3 AN: 31612

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000137 AC: 5 AN: 36562

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00346 AC: 87 AN: 25172

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 37426

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000759 AC: 6 AN: 79068

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 50282

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000971 AC: 103 AN: 1060346

Gnomad4 Remaining exome AF: 0.000434 AC: 25 AN: 57546

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000204 AC: 31 AN: 151970 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 15 AN XY: 74200

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000242 AC: 0.0000241628 AN: 0.0000241628

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000263 AC: 0.000262536 AN: 0.000262536

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00461 AC: 0.00461095 AN: 0.00461095

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 0

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000208 AC: 0.000207555 AN: 0.000207555

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 0

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000132 AC: 0.000132337 AN: 0.000132337

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 0

Alfa AF: 0.000376 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000200

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:10 Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1 Benign:4

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 02, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 11, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Uncertain:2

Jul 14, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:2

Jul 14, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:2

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Jul 14, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 5 Uncertain:2

May 18, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1

Jan 25, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.57
CADD	Benign	1.3
DANN	Benign	0.67
Mutation Taster		=300/0	polymorphism

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.17		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201295052; hg19: chr12-88510905;