Menu
GeneBe

rs201334214

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_144508.5(KNL1):​c.1768G>T​(p.Ala590Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00021 in 1,614,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

KNL1
NM_144508.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.474
Variant links:
Genes affected
KNL1 (HGNC:24054): (kinetochore scaffold 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the multiprotein assembly that is required for creation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments and chromosome segregation. The encoded protein functions as a scaffold for proteins that influence the spindle assembly checkpoint during the eukaryotic cell cycle and it interacts with at least five different kinetochore proteins and two checkpoint kinases. In adults, this gene is predominantly expressed in normal testes, various cancer cell lines and primary tumors from other tissues and is ubiquitously expressed in fetal tissues. This gene was originally identified as a fusion partner with the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) gene in t(11;15)(q23;q14). Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive primary microcephaly-4 (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. Additional splice variants have been described but their biological validity has not been confirmed. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010500997).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000282 (43/152348) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00105 (16/15302). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000656. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 26 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KNL1NM_144508.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1768G>T p.Ala590Ser missense_variant 10/26 ENST00000399668.7
KNL1NM_170589.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1846G>T p.Ala616Ser missense_variant 11/27

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KNL1ENST00000399668.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1768G>T p.Ala590Ser missense_variant 10/261 NM_144508.5 A2Q8NG31-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000282
AC:
43
AN:
152230
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000377
AC:
94
AN:
249114
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000362
AC XY:
49
AN XY:
135192
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000646
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000725
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000354
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00116
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000203
AC:
296
AN:
1461712
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.000202
AC XY:
147
AN XY:
727156
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000805
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00168
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000381
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000282
AC:
43
AN:
152348
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000349
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74510
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.000375
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000536
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000365
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000290
AC:
35
EpiCase
AF:
0.000709
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Microcephaly 4, primary, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingService de Génétique Moléculaire, Hôpital Robert Debré-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 25, 2016- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenDec 01, 2023KNL1: PM2:Supporting, BP4 -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 18, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.076
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.70
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.0050
DANN
Benign
0.13
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.017
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-2.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0066
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.32
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0028
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.83
N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.038
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;B
Vest4
0.025
MVP
0.055
MPC
0.035
ClinPred
0.022
T
GERP RS
-6.0
Varity_R
0.032
gMVP
0.084

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201334214; hg19: chr15-40914230; API