rs201345843
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_000719.7(CACNA1C):c.3969C>T(p.Ile1323=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000195 in 1,613,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CACNA1C
NM_000719.7 synonymous
NM_000719.7 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.93
Genes affected
CACNA1C (HGNC:1390): (calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 C) This gene encodes an alpha-1 subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel. Calcium channels mediate the influx of calcium ions into the cell upon membrane polarization. The alpha-1 subunit consists of 24 transmembrane segments and forms the pore through which ions pass into the cell. The calcium channel consists of a complex of alpha-1, alpha-2/delta, beta, and gamma subunits in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. There are multiple isoforms of each of these proteins, either encoded by different genes or the result of alternative splicing of transcripts. The protein encoded by this gene binds to and is inhibited by dihydropyridine. Alternative splicing results in many transcript variants encoding different proteins. Some of the predicted proteins may not produce functional ion channel subunits. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.19).
BP6
?
Variant 12-2651663-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-2651663-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 93405.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=3, Benign=1}.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 11 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1C | NM_000719.7 | c.3969C>T | p.Ile1323= | synonymous_variant | 32/47 | ENST00000399655.6 | |
CACNA1C | NM_001167623.2 | c.3969C>T | p.Ile1323= | synonymous_variant | 32/47 | ENST00000399603.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1C | ENST00000399603.6 | c.3969C>T | p.Ile1323= | synonymous_variant | 32/47 | 5 | NM_001167623.2 | ||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399655.6 | c.3969C>T | p.Ile1323= | synonymous_variant | 32/47 | 1 | NM_000719.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000641 AC: 16AN: 249526Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000591 AC XY: 8AN XY: 135276
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
249526
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
135276
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000208 AC: 304AN: 1461664Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 156AN XY: 727114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
304
AN:
1461664
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
156
AN XY:
727114
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74330
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74330
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 16, 2018 | The c.3969 C>T variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The c.3969 C>T variant was not observed with any significant frequency in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. The c.3969 C>T variant results in a synonymous amino acid substitution, I1323I, and in silico splice prediction programs are unable to predict whether this nucleotide substitution has an impact on normal gene splicing. Additionally, the majority of variants in the CACNA1C gene are missense changes (Stenson et al., 2014), indicating haploinsufficiency of CACNA1C may not be sufficient to cause disease. Nevertheless, this substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is pathogenic or rare benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 16, 2013 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 06, 2017 | Variant summary: The CACNA1C c.3969C>T (p.Ile1323Ile) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 15/277196 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.000118 (15/126706). This frequency is about 12 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CACNA1C variant (0.00001), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. The variant has been reported in the literature, without strong evidence for causality. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as uncertain significance, without evidence for independent evaluation. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
CACNA1C-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 14, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Dec 09, 2023 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 25, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at