rs201370621
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.2662G>A(p.Asp888Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00358 in 1,551,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0036 ( 23 hom. )
Consequence
RBM20
NM_001134363.3 missense
NM_001134363.3 missense
Scores
1
7
7
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.13
Genes affected
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008311868).
BP6
Variant 10-110821281-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110821281-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43995.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr10-110821281-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-110821281-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00324 (493/152322) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00362 (246/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00325. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 300 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 493 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | NM_001134363.3 | c.2662G>A | p.Asp888Asn | missense_variant | 11/14 | ENST00000369519.4 | NP_001127835.2 | |
RBM20 | XM_017016103.3 | c.2497G>A | p.Asp833Asn | missense_variant | 11/14 | XP_016871592.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_017016104.3 | c.2278G>A | p.Asp760Asn | missense_variant | 11/14 | XP_016871593.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_047425116.1 | c.2278G>A | p.Asp760Asn | missense_variant | 11/14 | XP_047281072.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | ENST00000369519.4 | c.2662G>A | p.Asp888Asn | missense_variant | 11/14 | 1 | NM_001134363.3 | ENSP00000358532 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00322 AC: 490AN: 152204Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
490
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00387 AC: 603AN: 155726Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00328 AC XY: 271AN XY: 82570
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
603
AN:
155726
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
271
AN XY:
82570
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00362 AC: 5059AN: 1398738Hom.: 23 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00343 AC XY: 2367AN XY: 689772
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5059
AN:
1398738
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
2367
AN XY:
689772
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00324 AC: 493AN: 152322Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00403 AC XY: 300AN XY: 74488
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
493
AN:
152322
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
300
AN XY:
74488
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
12
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
AC:
65
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 04, 2015 | p.Asp888Asn in exon 11 of RBM20: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 2% (32/1592) of Finnish chromosome s by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbS NP rs201370621). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 01, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Blueprint Genetics | Feb 17, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 14, 2021 | Variant summary: RBM20 c.2662G>A (p.Asp888Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0039 in 155726 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 82.6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RBM20 causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy phenotype (4.7e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.2662G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy, without strong evidence for causality. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Dilated Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. 12 clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University | Oct 07, 2014 | Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. p.Asp888Asn (c.2662 G>A) in RBM20 (NM_001134363.1) Based on failure to segregate, presence in a general population sample, and co-occurrence of other pathogenic variants in a subset of cases, we consider this variant to be a variant of uncertain significance, likely benign. It is also possible that it plays a role as a modifer though there is insufficient data available to assess that. Variants in RBM20 are relatively newly reported with cardiomyopathy and appear to be an infrequent cause of cardiomyopathy (1.9-3.0%) so only minimal data on disease-associated variation in this gene is available. Brauch et al (2009) performed genome-wide linkage analysis in two multi-generational kindreds with DCM, with a LOD score of 3.55. Sequencing of the candidate region identified two RBM20 variants, one in each family, that segregated with disease and were absent in 480 controls. They then performed DHLPC analysis of RBM20 in a cohort of 279 DCM patients and identified 6 additional families with RBM20 variants. Hershberger's group used a candidate gene approach, sequencing select RBM20 exons in 312 DCM probands and found rare variants in 6 unrelated patients. RBM20 has been implicated in abnormal TTN splicing and RBM20 deficient mice show signs of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias (Guo et al 2013). Based on the domains identified in RBM20 it is thought to be an RNA binding protein. The variant has been seen in at least 6 unrelated cases of DCM (not including this patient) and a case of pediatric restrictive cardiomyopathy. However in one unpublished family the variant did no co-segregate with DCM. Refaat et al (2012) reported the variant in a female with DCM and atrial fibrillation. They observed RBM20 variants in 3% of the 283 patients with non-ischemic DCM studied. Patients were recruited from the US and were participants in the Genetic Risk Assessment of Defibrillator Events (GRADE) study. Per the GeneDx report the LMM has a family with this variant and DCM where the variant failed to segregate with disease. Per the LMM's ClinVar submission (SCV000060626, last reviewed by LMM January 2013), they have seen the variant in 4 individuals with clinical features of DCM, one of whom has a likely pathogenic variant in another gene. In silico analysis with PolyPhen-2 predicts the variant to be probably damaging while SIFT predicts it to be tolerated. In total the variant has been seen in 3 of 3034 published controls and individuals from publicly available population datasets. However, the variant is listed in dbSNP with data from the exome chip and ClinSeq (rs201370621). Population frequency data in dbSNP from ClinSeq notes that 3 of ~284 individuals were heterozygous for this variant. There is no variation at codon 888 listed in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset, which currently includes variant calls on ~2750 Caucasian and African American individuals (as of March 8th, 2013). The variant was not observed in the following published control samples: 600 (Refaat et al 2012). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Apr 21, 2017 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 24, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2023 | RBM20: BS1 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy;C0018790:Cardiac arrest Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute | Mar 17, 2017 | This RBM20 Asp888Asn variant has previously been reported in DCM patients (Pugh TJ, et al., 2014; Refaat MM, et al., 2012) and is present in the large Exome Aggregation Consortium dataset (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/) at a minor allele frequency of 0.003 (European-Finnish subpopulation frequency is 0.02) which is much higher than expected for DCM (Nouhravesh N, et al., 2016) or any other inherited heart condition. Aspartic acid (Asp) at position 888 is only moderately conserved across mammals (not conserved in distantly related species). In silico tools SIFT, MutationTaster and PolyPhen-2 predict RBM20 Asp888Asn to have a possible damaging effect. Patients identified by our laboratory with the RBM20 Asp888Asn variant had different phenotypes: 1 HCM case, 1 patient who had a resuscitated cardiac arrest event, and 1 sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) case. In summary, based on the frequency of this variant in ~0.3% of the general population, and in 3 unrelated cases with varying disease manifestations in our data, we do not expect this variant to cause disease in isolation. In summary, we classify this variant as "benign". - |
RBM20-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 18, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Dec 01, 2015 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 11, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at