rs201374999

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001199107.2(TBC1D24):c.204G>A(p.Thr68Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00107 in 1,613,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

TBC1D24
NM_001199107.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.40

Variant links:

Genes affected

TBC1D24 (HGNC:29203): (TBC1 domain family member 24) This gene encodes a protein with a conserved domain, referred to as the TBC domain, characteristic of proteins which interact with GTPases. TBC domain proteins may serve as GTPase-activating proteins for a particular group of GTPases, the Rab (Ras-related proteins in brain) small GTPases which are involved in the regulation of membrane trafficking. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial infantile myoclonic epilepsy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

TBC1D24 links:

ENSG00000260272 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000260272 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).

BP6

Variant 16-2496352-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2496352-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 139393.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-2496352-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000663 (101/152352) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00911 (44/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00697. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 54 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TBC1D24	NM_001199107.2 link	c.204G>A	p.Thr68Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 8	ENST00000646147.1	NP_001186036.1	Q9ULP9-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TBC1D24	ENST00000646147.1 link	c.204G>A	p.Thr68Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 8		NM_001199107.2	ENSP00000494678.1		Q9ULP9-1
ENSG00000260272	ENST00000564543.1 link	c.204G>A	p.Thr68Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 3	2		ENSP00000455547.1		H3BQ06

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000663

AC:

101

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00910

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000720

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00143

AC:

356

AN:

248830

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00172

AC XY:

233

AN XY:

135250

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000130

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00748

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00101

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000331

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00111

AC:

1619

AN:

1461122

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00126

AC XY:

914

AN XY:

726902

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000201

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00725

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000834

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000663

AC:

101

AN:

152352

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000725

AC XY:

AN XY:

74508

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000962

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00911

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000720

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000520

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000434

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000818

EpiControl

AF:

0.00119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Jun 02, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Thr68Thr in exon 2 of TBC1D24: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.7% (123/16504) of South Asian chromosomes including 2 homozygotes by the Exome Aggregation Cons ortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201374999). -

Jul 06, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 04, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 16, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 24, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TBC1D24: BP4, BP7 -

Familial infantile myoclonic epilepsy

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jul 08, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

TBC1D24-related disorder

Benign:1

Mar 22, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 1;C3892048:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 65;CN236805:Caused by mutation in the TBC1 domain family, member 24

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.89

CADD

Benign

0.11

DANN

Benign

0.87

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over