rs201380599

Variant names:

• chr16-53649119-C-G
• rs201380599
• NM_015272.5:c.2153-4G>C

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr16-53649119-C-G
• chr16-53649119-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS1 BS2

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):​c.2153-4G>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00239 in 1,613,216 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0025 (8 hom.)
• Consequence: RPGRIP1L NM_015272.5 splice_region, intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.00001184
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3 B:6
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.0260

Genes affected

RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
• BP6: Variant 16-53649119-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53649119-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 95689.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=1, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr16-53649119-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00152 (231/152178) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00262 (178/68012). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0023. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 97 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	NM_015272.5	c.2153-4G>C		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 15 of 26	ENST00000647211.2	NP_056087.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	ENST00000647211.2	c.2153-4G>C		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 15 of 26		NM_015272.5	ENSP00000493946.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00152 AC: 231 AN: 152060 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000628

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000525

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00346

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000621

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00262

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00152 AC: 381 AN: 251314 Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 204 AN XY: 135838

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000800

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000781

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00228

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000947

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00246

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00147

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00248 AC: 3618 AN: 1461038 Hom.: 8 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00245 AC XY: 1779 AN XY: 726920

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000628

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000760

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00291

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000962

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.000131

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00297

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00157

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00152 AC: 231 AN: 152178 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00130 AC XY: 97 AN XY: 74382

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000626

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000524

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00346

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000621

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00262

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00189

Alfa AF: 0.00246 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00154

Asia WGS AF: 0.000289 AC: 1 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00191

EpiControl AF: 0.00267

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3 Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Oct 30, 2020	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -

Joubert syndrome 7 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Meckel syndrome, type 5 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Nephronophthisis 8 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Sep 19, 2015

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 28, 2025

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.78
CADD	Benign	1.3
DANN	Benign	0.39

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.000012
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.0040
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201380599; hg19: chr16-53683031;