rs201392536

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_003859.3(DPM1):c.22C>T(p.Arg8Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000138 in 1,613,770 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00015 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DPM1
NM_003859.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.391

Variant links:

Genes affected

DPM1 (HGNC:3005): (dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 1, catalytic) Dolichol-phosphate mannose (Dol-P-Man) serves as a donor of mannosyl residues on the lumenal side of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Lack of Dol-P-Man results in defective surface expression of GPI-anchored proteins. Dol-P-Man is synthesized from GDP-mannose and dolichol-phosphate on the cytosolic side of the ER by the enzyme dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase. Human DPM1 lacks a carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain and signal sequence and is regulated by DPM2. Mutations in this gene are associated with congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ie. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

DPM1 links:

DPM1 (HGNC:):

DPM1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00832814).

BP6

Variant 20-50958502-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-50958502-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 259186.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000151 (23/152126) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00194 (10/5152). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 9 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DPM1	NM_003859.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.22C>T	p.Arg8Cys	missense_variant	1/9	ENST00000371588.10	NP_003850.1	O60762A0A0S2Z4Y5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DPM1	ENST00000371588.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.22C>T	p.Arg8Cys	missense_variant	1/9	1	NM_003859.3	ENSP00000360644.5		O60762

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000145

AC:

AN:

152010

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00194

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000235

AC:

AN:

251266

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000214

AC XY:

AN XY:

135802

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00234

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000106

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000136

AC:

199

AN:

1461644

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000117

AC XY:

AN XY:

727122

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00176

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000106

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000151

AC:

AN:

152126

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74374

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00194

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000184

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000151

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000173

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1E

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Nov 08, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Sep 15, 2020

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.34

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.32

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.23

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.95

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.31

T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.92

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.0

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.11

LIST_S2

Benign

0.86

D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.15

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0083

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.87

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.34

N;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.42

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.45

N;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.30

Sift

Uncertain

0.013

D;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.056

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.47

P;.;.

Vest4

0.28

MVP

0.54

MPC

0.34

ClinPred

0.059

GERP RS

-0.070

Varity_R

0.12

gMVP

0.68

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over