Menu
GeneBe

rs201392536

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_003859.3(DPM1):c.22C>T(p.Arg8Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000138 in 1,613,770 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R8G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00015 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DPM1
NM_003859.3 missense

Scores

4
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.391
Variant links:
Genes affected
DPM1 (HGNC:3005): (dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 1, catalytic) Dolichol-phosphate mannose (Dol-P-Man) serves as a donor of mannosyl residues on the lumenal side of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Lack of Dol-P-Man results in defective surface expression of GPI-anchored proteins. Dol-P-Man is synthesized from GDP-mannose and dolichol-phosphate on the cytosolic side of the ER by the enzyme dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase. Human DPM1 lacks a carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain and signal sequence and is regulated by DPM2. Mutations in this gene are associated with congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ie. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00832814).
BP6
Variant 20-50958502-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-50958502-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 259186.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000151 (23/152126) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00194 (10/5152). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 9 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DPM1NM_003859.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.22C>T p.Arg8Cys missense_variant 1/9 ENST00000371588.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DPM1ENST00000371588.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.22C>T p.Arg8Cys missense_variant 1/91 NM_003859.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000145
AC:
22
AN:
152010
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000235
AC:
59
AN:
251266
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000214
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
135802
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00234
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000136
AC:
199
AN:
1461644
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000117
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
727122
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000828
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000151
AC:
23
AN:
152126
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000184
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000151
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000173
AC:
21
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1E Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeNov 08, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 15, 2020In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.34
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.32
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.23
Cadd
Benign
15
Dann
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.31
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.92
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.11
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.86
D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.15
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0083
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.87
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.34
N;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.42
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.45
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.30
Sift
Uncertain
0.013
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.056
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.47
P;.;.
Vest4
0.28
MVP
0.54
MPC
0.34
ClinPred
0.059
T
GERP RS
-0.070
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.68

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201392536; hg19: chr20-49575039; API