rs201400523
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):c.22005G>A(p.Thr7335=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000807 in 1,613,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T7335T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164507.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | NM_001164507.2 | c.22005G>A | p.Thr7335= | synonymous_variant | 149/182 | ENST00000427231.7 | |
NEB | NM_001164508.2 | c.22005G>A | p.Thr7335= | synonymous_variant | 149/182 | ENST00000397345.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.22005G>A | p.Thr7335= | synonymous_variant | 149/182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | P5 | |
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.22005G>A | p.Thr7335= | synonymous_variant | 149/182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000861 AC: 131AN: 152162Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00109 AC: 272AN: 248808Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00132 AC XY: 178AN XY: 134968
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000802 AC: 1172AN: 1461606Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000927 AC XY: 674AN XY: 727076
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000854 AC: 130AN: 152280Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000779 AC XY: 58AN XY: 74458
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Nov 11, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 19, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 21, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2022 | NEB: BP4, BP7 - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at