rs201401001

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2_Supporting

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.10470G>T(p.Val3490Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000595 in 1,613,932 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00062 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.606

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

USH2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Usher syndrome type 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
Usher syndrome type 2A
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
retinitis pigmentosa 39
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
retinitis pigmentosa
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

USH2A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 1-215782853-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-215782853-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48346.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.606 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
USH2A	NM_206933.4 link	c.10470G>T	p.Val3490Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 53 of 72	ENST00000307340.8	NP_996816.3	O75445-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
USH2A	ENST00000307340.8 link	c.10470G>T	p.Val3490Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 53 of 72	1	NM_206933.4	ENSP00000305941.3		O75445-1
USH2A	ENST00000674083.1 link	c.10470G>T	p.Val3490Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 53 of 73			ENSP00000501296.1		O75445-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000375

AC:

AN:

152148

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000558

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000247

AC:

AN:

251062

AF XY:

0.000265

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000290

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000893

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000396

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000491

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000619

AC:

905

AN:

1461666

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000582

AC XY:

423

AN XY:

727120

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

33464

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44694

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00119

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39682

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000759

AC:

844

AN:

1111892

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000381

AC:

AN:

60380

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

102

153

204

255

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

114

152

190

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

152266

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000430

AC XY:

AN XY:

74462

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

41546

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15280

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000559

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000442

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000374

EpiCase

AF:

0.000491

EpiControl

AF:

0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Nov 16, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

USH2A: BP4, BP7 -

Jan 13, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 04, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Val3490Val in Exon 53 of USH2A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 1/7020 European Amer ican chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project ( http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

0.77

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.70

PhyloP100

0.61

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over