rs201402970
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_201384.3(PLEC):c.9577G>T(p.Gly3193Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000781 in 1,600,096 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_201384.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLEC | NM_201384.3 | c.9577G>T | p.Gly3193Cys | missense_variant | 32/32 | ENST00000345136.8 | NP_958786.1 | |
PLEC | NM_201378.4 | c.9535G>T | p.Gly3179Cys | missense_variant | 32/32 | ENST00000356346.7 | NP_958780.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLEC | ENST00000345136.8 | c.9577G>T | p.Gly3193Cys | missense_variant | 32/32 | 1 | NM_201384.3 | ENSP00000344848 | ||
PLEC | ENST00000356346.7 | c.9535G>T | p.Gly3179Cys | missense_variant | 32/32 | 1 | NM_201378.4 | ENSP00000348702 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000401 AC: 61AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000119 AC: 26AN: 219396Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000819 AC XY: 10AN XY: 122140
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000442 AC: 64AN: 1447864Hom.: 0 Cov.: 73 AF XY: 0.0000319 AC XY: 23AN XY: 720474
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000401 AC: 61AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000417 AC XY: 31AN XY: 74374
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Nov 04, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 23, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 31, 2020 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 08, 2024 | The c.9658G>T (p.G3220C) alteration is located in exon 33 (coding exon 32) of the PLEC gene. This alteration results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 9658, causing the glycine (G) at amino acid position 3220 to be replaced by a cysteine (C). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Epidermolysis bullosa simplex, Ogna type;C2677349:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5C, with pyloric atresia;C2931072:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5B, with muscular dystrophy;C3150989:Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2Q;C4225309:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex with nail dystrophy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 16, 2023 | This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 3220 of the PLEC protein (p.Gly3220Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs201402970, gnomAD 0.1%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PLEC-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 497042). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at