rs201403794

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_005546.4(ITK):​c.237G>A​(p.Pro79Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000293 in 1,607,372 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

ITK
NM_005546.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.88

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ITK (HGNC:6171): (IL2 inducible T cell kinase) This gene encodes an intracellular tyrosine kinase expressed in T-cells. The protein contains both SH2 and SH3 domains which are often found in intracellular kinases. It is thought to play a role in T-cell proliferation and differentiation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ITK Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • lymphoproliferative syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • lymphoproliferative syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 5-157208987-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-157208987-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 352458.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.88 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000243 (37/152210) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00104 (5/4816). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000409. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 18 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ITKNM_005546.4 linkc.237G>A p.Pro79Pro synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 17 ENST00000422843.8 NP_005537.3 Q08881

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ITKENST00000422843.8 linkc.237G>A p.Pro79Pro synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 17 1 NM_005546.4 ENSP00000398655.4 Q08881

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152092
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000368
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000350
AC:
88
AN:
251204
AF XY:
0.000368
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000596
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000298
AC:
434
AN:
1455162
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.000330
AC XY:
239
AN XY:
724444
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000900
AC:
3
AN:
33340
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000291
AC:
13
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000613
AC:
16
AN:
26080
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39646
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000941
AC:
81
AN:
86120
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000749
AC:
4
AN:
53406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00417
AC:
24
AN:
5750
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000241
AC:
266
AN:
1105916
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000432
AC:
26
AN:
60186
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.461
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
25
50
76
101
126
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152210
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000242
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74410
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000120
AC:
5
AN:
41546
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
5
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000368
AC:
25
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000474
AC:
1
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000409
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000223
EpiCase
AF:
0.000600
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Lymphoproliferative syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 07, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
2.8
DANN
Benign
0.78
PhyloP100
-1.9
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201403794; hg19: chr5-156635998; COSMIC: COSV70060419; API