rs201415443
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP6BS1BS2
The NM_002473.6(MYH9):āc.32A>Gā(p.Tyr11Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0003 in 1,614,084 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00032 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MYH9
NM_002473.6 missense
NM_002473.6 missense
Scores
3
12
4
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.64
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), MYH9. . Gene score misZ 3.473 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 6.1231 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with May-Hegglin anomaly, autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss, macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss, autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17.
BP6
Variant 22-36349205-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36349205-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 504627.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=2}. Variant chr22-36349205-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000138 (21/152204) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000265 (18/68042). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000171. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 21 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH9 | NM_002473.6 | c.32A>G | p.Tyr11Cys | missense_variant | 2/41 | ENST00000216181.11 | NP_002464.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH9 | ENST00000216181.11 | c.32A>G | p.Tyr11Cys | missense_variant | 2/41 | 1 | NM_002473.6 | ENSP00000216181.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
21
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000144 AC: 36AN: 249618Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000155 AC XY: 21AN XY: 135086
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
36
AN:
249618
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
135086
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000317 AC: 463AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000292 AC XY: 212AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
463
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
212
AN XY:
727244
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74364
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
21
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74364
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
AC:
16
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 09, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
MYH9-related disorder Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 10, 2024 | The MYH9 c.32A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Tyr11Cys. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.028% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 23, 2016 | The p.Tyr11Cys variant in MYH9 has not been previously reported in individuals w ith hearing loss or MYH9-related disorders. This variant has been identified in 15/66420 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http:/ /exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201415443); however, this frequency is not hig h enough to rule out a pathogenic role. Computational prediction tools and conse rvation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the p rotein. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 24, 2022 | The c.32A>G (p.Y11C) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 1) of the MYH9 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 32, causing the tyrosine (Y) at amino acid position 11 to be replaced by a cysteine (C). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
T;T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;.;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Benign
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T
Polyphen
P;B;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at