rs201449986

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000169.3(GLA):​c.48T>G​(p.Leu16Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000289 in 1,210,031 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 89 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L16L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., 4 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 0 hom. 85 hem. )

Consequence

GLA
NM_000169.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0120

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GLA (HGNC:4296): (galactosidase alpha) This gene encodes a homodimeric glycoprotein that hydrolyses the terminal alpha-galactosyl moieties from glycolipids and glycoproteins. This enzyme predominantly hydrolyzes ceramide trihexoside, and it can catalyze the hydrolysis of melibiose into galactose and glucose. A variety of mutations in this gene affect the synthesis, processing, and stability of this enzyme, which causes Fabry disease, a rare lysosomal storage disorder that results from a failure to catabolize alpha-D-galactosyl glycolipid moieties. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
RPL36A-HNRNPH2 (HGNC:48349): (RPL36A-HNRNPH2 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring ribosomal protein L36a and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H2 (H') genes on chromosome X. The read-through transcript produces a protein with similarity to the protein encoded by the upstream locus, ribosomal protein L36a. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant X-101407856-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-101407856-A-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 42455.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.012 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000116 (13/112283) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000207 (11/53187). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000116. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 4 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 XL gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000169.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
GLA
NM_000169.3
MANE Select
c.48T>Gp.Leu16Leu
synonymous
Exon 1 of 7NP_000160.1
GLA
NM_001406747.1
c.48T>Gp.Leu16Leu
synonymous
Exon 1 of 8NP_001393676.1
GLA
NM_001406748.1
c.48T>Gp.Leu16Leu
synonymous
Exon 1 of 6NP_001393677.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
GLA
ENST00000218516.4
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.48T>Gp.Leu16Leu
synonymous
Exon 1 of 7ENSP00000218516.4
RPL36A-HNRNPH2
ENST00000409170.3
TSL:4
c.301-4080A>C
intron
N/AENSP00000386655.4
GLA
ENST00000649178.1
c.48T>Gp.Leu16Leu
synonymous
Exon 1 of 8ENSP00000498186.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000116
AC:
13
AN:
112226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
23
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000938
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000660
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000196
AC:
36
AN:
183415
AF XY:
0.0000737
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000391
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000221
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000307
AC:
337
AN:
1097748
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000234
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
363104
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26392
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000199
AC:
7
AN:
35207
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
19385
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30204
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
54131
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
40533
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4122
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000385
AC:
324
AN:
841701
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000130
AC:
6
AN:
46073
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15
29
44
58
73
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000116
AC:
13
AN:
112283
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.000116
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
34425
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30939
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000937
AC:
1
AN:
10674
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2650
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3563
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2703
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
6130
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
218
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
11
AN:
53187
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000651
AC:
1
AN:
1535
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000130
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000128
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Fabry disease Benign:7
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 16, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 15, 2025
Genomenon, Inc, Genomenon, Inc
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

GLA c.48T>G is a synonymous (silent) variant that retains Leucine at residue 16. This variant has been observed in at least one proband affected with Fabry disease (PMID: 27585509; 34118938). Functional studies have been reported; however, the significance of the findings remain unclear and/or were performed in patient cells (PMID: 26866599; 27585509). This synonymous variant is not predicted to impact splicing and does not affect a conserved nucleotide. It is absent or not present at a significant frequency in gnomAD. In conclusion, we classify GLA c.48T>G as a likely benign variant.

May 29, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Jan 22, 2020
Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

The c.48T>G variant in GLA has not been previously reported in individuals with Fabry disease, and has been identified in 0.039% (36/92630) of European (non-Finnish) chromosomes, including 5 hemizygotes, 0.019% (1/5335) of other chromosomes, and 0.011% (3/28053) of Latino chromosomes, including 1 hemizygote, by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201449986). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar as likely bengin by the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine (Partners Healthcare), GeneDx, and Invitae and a VUS by Illumina Clinical Services Laboratory (ID:42455). Computational prediction tools, including splice predictors, and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1, BP7 (Richards 2015).

not provided Benign:6
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 23, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26866599)

Jul 29, 2025
Revvity Omics, Revvity
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:flagged submission
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

GLA: BP4, BP7, BS2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:2
Jan 21, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 08, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Leu16Leu in exon 1 of GLA: This variant is not expected to have clinical signifi cance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 1/6728 European America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.ed/EVS/;). Leu16Leu in exon 1 of GLA (allele frequency = 1/6728) **

GLA-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 10, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Sep 29, 2022
Cohesion Phenomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Nov 24, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
5.6
DANN
Benign
0.61
PhyloP100
-0.012
PromoterAI
0.039
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201449986; hg19: chrX-100662844; API