rs201455322
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000033.4(ABCD1):c.707G>A(p.Arg236His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000651 in 1,209,571 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. There are 251 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000033.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCD1 | NM_000033.4 | c.707G>A | p.Arg236His | missense_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000218104.6 | NP_000024.2 | |
ABCD1 | XM_047441916.1 | c.707G>A | p.Arg236His | missense_variant | 1/11 | XP_047297872.1 | ||
ABCD1 | XM_047441917.1 | c.707G>A | p.Arg236His | missense_variant | 1/8 | XP_047297873.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCD1 | ENST00000218104.6 | c.707G>A | p.Arg236His | missense_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_000033.4 | ENSP00000218104.3 | ||
ABCD1 | ENST00000370129.4 | c.152G>A | p.Arg51His | missense_variant | 1/2 | 2 | ENSP00000359147.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00115 AC: 131AN: 113821Hom.: 2 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00128 AC XY: 46AN XY: 35945
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00142 AC: 254AN: 178848Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00125 AC XY: 82AN XY: 65494
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000600 AC: 657AN: 1095750Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000566 AC XY: 205AN XY: 362198
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00115 AC: 131AN: 113821Hom.: 2 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00128 AC XY: 46AN XY: 35945
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Adrenoleukodystrophy Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Jun 16, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 11, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12175782, 23430809, 33151932) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | ABCD1: BS1, BS2 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 16, 2014 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 04, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at