rs201481342
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 1P and 0B. PP2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1024A>G (p.Ile342Val) variant in BRAF has been identified in 0.005644% (2/35438) of Latino chromosomes in gnomAD v2.1.1. This variant has been observed in several individuals whose clinical presentations lacked clear associations with a RASopathy (Invitae internal data, SCV000820707.1; Fulgent internal data; Baylor internal data; Greenwood Genetic Center internal data). Of note, this variant has also been seen in apparently unaffected parental samples (n=8) evaluated during whole exome sequencing suggesting that this variant may be likely benign; however, these cases were not well-phenotyped and therefore do not meet current requirements for BS2 (BS2 not met; GeneDx internal data, SCV000617143.2). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for pathogenicity given the disease mechanism. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA4516829/MONDO:0021060/004
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001374258.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cardiofaciocutaneous syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- LEOPARD syndrome 3Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
- Noonan syndrome 7Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, G2P, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
- Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Noonan syndrome with multiple lentiginesInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- anaplastic astrocytomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- Costello syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 151978Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000398 AC: 10AN: 251454 AF XY: 0.0000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000568 AC: 83AN: 1461862Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000495 AC XY: 36AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 152096Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74372 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
RASopathy Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 342 of the BRAF protein (p.Ile342Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs201481342, gnomAD 0.006%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BRAF-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 359048). Invitae Evidence Modeling incorporating data from in vitro experimental studies (internal data) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRAF function with a negative predictive value of 95%. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
The c.1024A>G (p.Ile342Val) variant in BRAF has been identified in 0.005644% (2/35438) of Latino chromosomes in gnomAD v2.1.1. This variant has been observed in several individuals whose clinical presentations lacked clear associations with a RASopathy (Invitae internal data, SCV000820707.1; Fulgent internal data; Baylor internal data; Greenwood Genetic Center internal data). Of note, this variant has also been seen in apparently unaffected parental samples (n=8) evaluated during whole exome sequencing suggesting that this variant may be likely benign; however, these cases were not well-phenotyped and therefore do not meet current requirements for BS2 (BS2 not met; GeneDx internal data, SCV000617143.2). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for pathogenicity given the disease mechanism. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain.
Noonan syndrome 7 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.
Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
A BRAF c.1024A>G (p.Ile342Val) variant was identified at a near heterozygous allelic fraction of 47%, a frequency which may be consistent with it being of germline origin. This variant is observed on 92/1,613,958 alleles in the general population (gnomAD v.4.1.0). It has been reported in the ClinVar database as a germline variant of uncertain significance by five submitters, including an expert panel, and likely benign by one submitter (ClinVar ID: 359048). Computational predictors suggest that the variant does not impact BRAF function. The BRAF gene is defined by the ClinGen's RASopathy expert panel as a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where pathogenic missense variants are a common mechanism of disease (Gelb BD et al., PMID: 29493581). Due to limited information and based on ACMG/AMP guidelines for variant interpretation (Richards S et al., PMID: 25741868) and gene-specific practices from the ClinGen Criteria Specification Registry (Gelb BD et al., PMID: 29493581), the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time.
LEOPARD syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.
Lung cancer;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C1835047:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 1;C3150970:Noonan syndrome 7;C3150971:LEOPARD syndrome 3;CN029449:Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
not provided Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at