rs201490017

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001376256.1(CRYM):c.343A>G(p.Ile115Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00104 in 1,614,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 30 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00059 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 28 hom. )

Consequence

CRYM
NM_001376256.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.55

Variant links:

Genes affected

CRYM (HGNC:2418): (crystallin mu) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific and ubiquitous. The former class is also called phylogenetically-restricted crystallins. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. This gene encodes a taxon-specific crystallin protein that binds NADPH and has sequence similarity to bacterial ornithine cyclodeaminases. The encoded protein does not perform a structural role in lens tissue, and instead it binds thyroid hormone for possible regulatory or developmental roles. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal dominant non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2014]

CRYM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012759268).

BP6

Variant 16-21275576-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-21275576-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 179476.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr16-21275576-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00108 (1585/1461748) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0173 (1493/86244). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0166. There are 28 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1151 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 90 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRYM	NM_001376256.1 link	c.343A>G	p.Ile115Val	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 8	ENST00000572914.2	NP_001363185.1
CRYM	NM_001888.5 link	c.343A>G	p.Ile115Val	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 10		NP_001879.1	Q14894

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CRYM	ENST00000572914.2 link	c.343A>G	p.Ile115Val	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 8	2	NM_001376256.1	ENSP00000461904.2		Q14894I3NI53

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000598

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000384

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0174

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00207

AC:

520

AN:

251412

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00294

AC XY:

400

AN XY:

135876

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0167

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00108

AC:

1585

AN:

1461748

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00158

AC XY:

1151

AN XY:

727174

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000894

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000756

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0173

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000171

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00103

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000591

AC:

AN:

152354

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000886

AC XY:

AN XY:

74504

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000240

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000385

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0172

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000179

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000140

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00242

AC:

294

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00635

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Sep 28, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 25, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Dec 15, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Ile115Val varia nt in CRYM has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss, bu t has been identified in 0.01% (1/8600) of European American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu; dbSNP rs201490017) . Computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties, conservation, Alig nGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) suggest this variant may not impact the protein, tho ugh this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summ ary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certain ty; however, based upon the computational data we lean towards a more likely ben ign role. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.23

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.28

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.17

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.34

T;T;.;T

Eigen

Benign

0.18

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.28

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.97

MetaRNN

Benign

0.013

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.55

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

L;L;.;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.65

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.80

N;N;.;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.37

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.18

T;T;.;.

Polyphen

0.49

P;P;.;.

Vest4

0.48

MVP

0.77

MPC

0.55

ClinPred

0.13

GERP RS

4.5

Varity_R

0.65

gMVP

0.71

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over