rs201507202
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.375T>G (p.Ser125=) variant in the BRAF gene is 0.054% (9/8644) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA135125/MONDO:0021060/004
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000069 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRAF
NM_004333.6 synonymous
NM_004333.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0910
Genes affected
BRAF (HGNC:1097): (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) This gene encodes a protein belonging to the RAF family of serine/threonine protein kinases. This protein plays a role in regulating the MAP kinase/ERK signaling pathway, which affects cell division, differentiation, and secretion. Mutations in this gene, most commonly the V600E mutation, are the most frequently identified cancer-causing mutations in melanoma, and have been identified in various other cancers as well, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, colorectal cancer, thyroid carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, hairy cell leukemia and adenocarcinoma of lung. Mutations in this gene are also associated with cardiofaciocutaneous, Noonan, and Costello syndromes, which exhibit overlapping phenotypes. A pseudogene of this gene has been identified on the X chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | NM_001374258.1 | c.375T>G | p.Ser125Ser | synonymous_variant | 3/20 | ENST00000644969.2 | NP_001361187.1 | |
BRAF | NM_004333.6 | c.375T>G | p.Ser125Ser | synonymous_variant | 3/18 | ENST00000646891.2 | NP_004324.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | ENST00000644969.2 | c.375T>G | p.Ser125Ser | synonymous_variant | 3/20 | NM_001374258.1 | ENSP00000496776.1 | |||
BRAF | ENST00000646891.2 | c.375T>G | p.Ser125Ser | synonymous_variant | 3/18 | NM_004333.6 | ENSP00000493543.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
19
AN:
152238
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000107 AC: 27AN: 251440Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135888
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
27
AN:
251440
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
135888
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000691 AC: 101AN: 1461860Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000811 AC XY: 59AN XY: 727220
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
101
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
727220
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152356Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74502
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
18
AN:
152356
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74502
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 30, 2012 | Ser125Ser in Exon 03 of BRAF: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in approximately 0.1% (2/ 2178) of chromosomes from a broad mixed population by the 1000 Genomes Project ( http://1000genomes.org/; dbSNP rs201507202). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 06, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 06, 2016 | Variant summary: The BRAF c.375T>G (p.Ser125Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. This variant was found in 15/121392 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001236, which is approximately 49 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRAF variant (0.0000025), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign. Taken together, based on the prevalence in the general population, the variant was classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2023 | BRAF: BP4, BP7, BS1 - |
RASopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 30, 2023 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel | Apr 18, 2017 | The filtering allele frequency of the c.375T>G (p.Ser125=) variant in the BRAF gene is 0.054% (9/8644) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) - |
Noonan syndrome 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
BRAF-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 01, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
LEOPARD syndrome 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 13, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Aug 01, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at