rs201509408

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000503.6(EYA1):c.671G>T(p.Gly224Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000143 in 1,614,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

EYA1
NM_000503.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.79

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

EYA1 (HGNC:3519): (EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 1) This gene encodes a member of the eyes absent (EYA) family of proteins. The encoded protein may play a role in the developing kidney, branchial arches, eye, and ear. Mutations of this gene have been associated with branchiootorenal dysplasia syndrome, branchiootic syndrome, and sporadic cases of congenital cataracts and ocular anterior segment anomalies. A similar protein in mice can act as a transcriptional activator. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]

EYA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

branchio-oto-renal syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
branchiootorenal syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
branchiootic syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
branchiootic syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

EYA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.09004584).

BP6

Variant 8-71299202-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-71299202-C-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 225350.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000112 (17/152244) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00309 (16/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00194. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 9 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 17 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EYA1	NM_000503.6 link	c.671G>T	p.Gly224Val	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 18	ENST00000340726.8	NP_000494.2	Q99502-1A0A024R813B3KXR1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
EYA1	ENST00000340726.8 link	c.671G>T	p.Gly224Val	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 18	1	NM_000503.6	ENSP00000342626.3		Q99502-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152126

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00308

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000107

AC:

AN:

251462

AF XY:

0.000125

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00147

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000146

AC:

214

AN:

1461838

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000139

AC XY:

101

AN XY:

727230

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00526

AC:

209

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000828

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152244

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41548

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15290

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00309

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4812

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10598

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.510

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000162

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

ExAC

AF:

0.000132

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Branchiootorenal syndrome 1

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Mar 18, 2016

Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:reference population

- -

Dec 31, 2019

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Nov 21, 2019

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Branchiootic syndrome 1;C3714941:Otofaciocervical syndrome 1;C4551702:Branchiootorenal syndrome 1

Benign:1

Mar 27, 2024

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.21

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.045

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.27

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.53

D;D;D;.;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.34

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.45

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.97

.;.;.;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.12

MetaRNN

Benign

0.090

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.27

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

L;L;L;.;.;.;L;L;.;.;.;.;.

PhyloP100

5.8

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.84

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.3

N;.;N;N;N;N;.;.;.;.;.;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.60

Sift

Uncertain

0.0040

D;.;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;.;.;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.029

D;.;D;T;D;T;.;.;.;.;.;T;T

Polyphen

0.95

P;P;P;.;P;P;P;P;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.88

MVP

0.95

MPC

0.84

ClinPred

0.20

GERP RS

5.1

Varity_R

0.62

gMVP

0.55

Mutation Taster

=0/100

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.12

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over