Menu
GeneBe

rs201535856

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.7908C>T(p.Ala2636=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00196 in 1,551,306 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.37
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 17-18152126-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18152126-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 45762.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-18152126-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.37 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.7908C>T p.Ala2636= synonymous_variant 42/66 ENST00000647165.2
LOC124903944XR_007065652.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.74-220G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
MYO15AXM_017024715.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.7911C>T p.Ala2637= synonymous_variant 40/64
MYO15AXM_017024714.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.7848C>T p.Ala2616= synonymous_variant 39/63

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.7908C>T p.Ala2636= synonymous_variant 42/66 NM_016239.4 P1Q9UKN7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00119
AC:
181
AN:
152118
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00128
AC:
198
AN:
154580
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00136
AC XY:
111
AN XY:
81884
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000251
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000728
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000352
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00115
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00204
AC:
2852
AN:
1399070
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00200
AC XY:
1377
AN XY:
690050
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000443
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000280
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000204
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00240
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00119
AC:
181
AN:
152236
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00103
AC XY:
77
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00137
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00121
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJun 03, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 24, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2022MYO15A: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 28, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineAug 16, 2016p.Ala2636Ala in Exon 42 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.2% (19/8196) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.bro adinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201535856). -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
Cadd
Benign
0.87
Dann
Benign
0.51

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201535856; hg19: chr17-18055440; API